Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Show Cause Notices Quashed Under Companies Act for New Management Post-Liquidation even if sold as a going concern

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The HC quashed the impugned show cause notices issued under the Companies Act, 2013, against the petitioner company, which had been sold as a going concern by the liquidator under the IBC Regulations. The Court held that liquidation results in the civil death of the original company, with only its corporate identity continuing under new management, thereby granting a "clean slate." Criminal liability for pre-liquidation offences does not extend to the new management, except for persons involved in the day-to-day operations prior to CIRP commencement. The Court observed that further prosecution would undermine the purpose of protection afforded to the new management post-liquidation. Despite multiple replies to notices, the first respondent .........