Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 960

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") pertaining to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2023-24. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: "Ground 1: The Ld Additional/Joint Commissioner Appeals has erred in facts and law in dismissing appeal and not allowing the deduction under section 80JJAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the reason that the form 10DA has been filed belatedly by a delay of 29 days and thereby denying the deduction under section 80JJAA which is otherwise eligible to the appellant. Ground 2: The Ld Additional/Joint Commissioner Appeals as well as the assessing officer has erred on facts as well as in law in charging interest under section 2348 of the Income Tax Act Ground 3: The Ld Additional/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. Craftsman Automation P. Ltd. Vs. CIT, (2021) 8 TMI 175 (Madras HC) and * the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of PCIT vs. M/s. Surya Merchants Ltd., (2016) 5 TMI 947 (All HC). 5. The submissions of the assessee in this regard are contained at page nos. 3 & 4 of the order of the Ld.CIT(A) as under: "1. It is submitted that the deduction of Rs 9260717.00 is eligible to the assessee and that the same has also been reflected in the form 3CA 3CD. 2. The amount of deduction of Rs 9260717.00 has also been shown in the return of income. Only delay that has occurred is in filling form 10DA. 3. The assessee has filed Form-10DA for deduction U/s 80JJAA on 29th Novem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/S Surya Merchants Ltd. (2016) 5 TMI (All HC) wherein it is held that the filing of audit report with the return of income is not a mandatory requirement but a directory requirement and that the requirement would stand satisfied if the audit report is filed before the framing of the assessment relying on various pronouncements. 10. The above decision of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Versus M/S Surya Merchants Ltd. (2016) 5 TMI (All HC) has also been upheld by Hon Supreme Court in PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) KANPUR VERSUS M/S SURYA MERCHANTS LTD. (2017) 3 TMI 94 (SC). 11. The wordings of section 801A or 801B or 80JJAA so far as furnishing of report is concerned is pari ma....