Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Moratorium under IBC Section 14 Doesn't Stop ED's Provisional Attachment of Tainted Assets Under PMLA

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The NCLAT upheld the refusal of the Adjudicating Authority to direct the ED to release provisionally attached assets of the Corporate Debtor under the PMLA during CIRP. It held that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC does not prohibit provisional attachment of assets linked to pre-existing criminal investigations involving proceeds of crime. Section 238 of the IBC does not override the PMLA in cases of inconsistency, particularly concerning tainted assets, as both statutes operate in distinct fields with complementary objectives. The tribunal affirmed that tainted assets are excluded from the commercial asset pool protected under the IBC. Further, NCLT/NCLAT lack jurisdiction to interfere with confirmed attachment orders under the P.........