Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Strengthening Transfer Pricing Enforcement : Clause 457 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 271G of the Income-tax Act, 1961

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he legislative intent behind such provisions is to ensure compliance with transfer pricing regulations, enhance transparency, and deter tax avoidance through non-disclosure or inadequate disclosure of cross-border or specified domestic transactions. The legal context for both provisions is rooted in the global movement towards stricter transfer pricing regulations, aligning with international standards such as those set by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The provisions are significant because they form the backbone of India's enforcement mechanism for transfer pricing compliance, an area that has seen increased scrutiny in response to base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) concerns. This commentary pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is of Clause 457 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Text of Clause 457: If any person who has entered into an international transaction or specified domestic transaction fails to furnish any such information or document as required by section 171(2), a penalty equal to 2% of the value of such transaction may be imposed upon him for each such failure by the Assessing Officer or the Transfer Pricing Officer as referred to in Section 166 or the Commissioner (Appeals). 1. Scope of Application Clause 457 applies to any person engaged in international transactions or specified domestic transactions. The terms "international transaction" and "specified domestic transaction" are likely defined elsewhere in the Bill, presumably in line with their defi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....governed by the general penalty provisions or procedural codes within the Act or Bill. 5. Relationship with Section 171(2) Clause 457 is directly linked to compliance with Section 171(2). The latter presumably sets out the obligation to maintain and furnish transfer pricing documentation, which is a cornerstone of the transfer pricing regime. The penalty under Clause 457 acts as the enforcement mechanism for the substantive requirements of Section 171(2). 6. Ambiguities and Issues in Interpretation While the text of Clause 457 is clear in its basic structure, certain interpretational issues may arise: * Definition of "failure": Does "failure" include delayed furnishing, incomplete information, or only complete non-submission? * Comp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the failure to furnish information or documentation relating to international or specified domestic transactions. * Quantum of Penalty: Both prescribe a penalty of 2% of the value of the transaction for each failure. * Authorities Empowered: In both, the Assessing Officer, the Transfer Pricing Officer, and the Commissioner (Appeals) are vested with the power to impose the penalty. * Scope: Both apply to international transactions and specified domestic transactions, reflecting the expanded scope post-2012 to include domestic related party transactions. 3. Points of Difference * Reference Provision: Section 271G refers to a failure to furnish documents as required by sub-section (3) of Section 92D, while Clause 457 refers to Section....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....penalty of 2% of transaction value is stringent compared to some other jurisdictions, where penalties may be fixed amounts or a percentage of tax underpaid rather than transaction value. This reflects India's strict approach to transfer pricing compliance, given the high risk of revenue loss through mispricing. 6. Potential Conflicts and Harmonization The migration from the 1961 Act to the new Bill requires careful harmonization to avoid overlaps or conflicts between penalty provisions, especially during the transition period. Stakeholders will need clarity on the applicability of the old and new regimes to transactions spanning the changeover date. Practical Implications 1. Impact on Taxpayers Taxpayers engaged in international o....