Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Valuation under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Remanded for Revised DVO Report Considering Assessee's Evidence

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The ITAT remitted the issue of valuation under section 56(2)(vii)(b) back to the AO for obtaining a revised detailed valuation report from the DVO, considering additional evidence submitted by the assessee challenging the comparability and encumbrance discounts applied by the original DVO report. The tribunal found merit in the assessee's contentions that the sale instances used by the DVO were not appropriate comparables due to differences in land size, type (leasehold vs. freehold), and nature of encumbrances. The tribunal declined to accept the purchase price as the correct value but held that the original DVO valuation was inadequately justified. Other grounds regarding applicability of section 56(2)(vii)(b) were left undecided. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.....