Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Penalties under Customs Act Sections 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA Quashed Due to Lack of Evidence and Inquiry Failures

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed under Sections 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act. The tribunal found no credible evidence of misdeclaration or manipulation of the Certificate of Origin regarding dry dates exported from UAE versus Pakistan, noting failure to conduct proper inquiries with issuing authorities as required under the Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin) Rules, 2020. Penalties under Section 112(a) were held applicable despite absence of mens rea, but Section 112(b) penalties requiring intent were not sustained. The allegations against the individual accused of masterminding the scheme lacked substantiation. Consequently, confiscation and penalty orders were quashed, and the appellants' appeals were allowed.....