2025 (7) TMI 401
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l Year 2018-19, as also the consequent order dated 15th April, 2024 passed by the office of Sales Tax Officer Class II/ AVATO, Delhi (hereinafter, 'the impugned order'). 3. The present petition further challenges the vires of Notification No.56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December, 2023 and Notification No. 9/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March, 2023 (hereinafter 'impugned notifications'). 4. The Petitioner is a sole proprietary concern of Mr. Nikhil Kumar Bansal. The Petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing footwear. It is duly registered under the GST regime with GST No. 07CPLPB207F1Z0 since 1st July, 2017. 5. A SCN was issued on 8th January, 2024 in respect of Financial Years 2018-19 under Section 73 of the Central Goods a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er the expiry of the limitation in terms of the Notification No. 13 of 2022 (State Tax). 5. In fact, Notification Nos. 09 and 56 of 2023 (Central Tax) were challenged before various other High Courts. The Allahabad Court has upheld the validity of Notification no. 9. The Patna High Court has upheld the validity of Notification no. 56. Whereas, the Guwahati High Court has quashed Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). 6. The Telangana High Court while not delving into the vires of the assailed notifications, made certain observations in respect of invalidity of Notification No. 56 of 2023 (Central Tax). This judgment of the Telangana High Court is now presently under consideration by the Supreme Court in S.L.P No 4240/2025 titled M/s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd the Punjab and Haryana High Court. In the Punjab and Haryana High Court vide order dated 12th March, 2025, all the writ petitions have been disposed of in terms of the interim orders passed therein. The operative portion of the said order reads as under: "65. Almost all the issues, which have been raised before us in these present connected cases and have been noticed hereinabove, are the subject matter of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid SLP. 66. Keeping in view the judicial discipline, we refrain from giving our opinion with respect to the vires of Section 168-A of the Act as well as the notifications issued in purported exercise of power under Section 168-A of the Act which have been challenged, and we direct that al....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g upon the categories of petitions, orders can be passed affording an opportunity to the Petitioners to place their stand before the adjudicating authority. In some cases, proceedings including appellate remedies may be permitted to be pursued by the Petitioners, without delving into the question of the validity of the said notifications at this stage. 11. The said categories and proposed reliefs have been broadly put to the parties today. They may seek instructions and revert by tomorrow i.e., 23rd April, 2025." 7. Thereafter, on 23rd April, 2025, this Court, having noted that the validity of the impugned notifications are under consideration before the Supreme Court, had disposed of several matters in the said batch of petitions after ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tab' had remanded the matter in the following terms: "6. Be that as it may, intention is to ensure that the Petitioner is given an opportunity to file its reply and is heard on merits and that orders are not passed in default. Since there is no clarity on behalf of the Department, this Court follows the order dated 9th September, 2024 in Satish Chand Mittal (Trade Name National Rubber Products) vs. Sales Tax Officer SGST, Ward 25-Zone 1 as also order dated 23rd December, 2024 in Anant Wire Industries vs. Sales Tax Officers Class II/Avato, Ward 83 & Anr (W.P.(C) 17867/2024; DHC) where the Court under similar circumstances has remanded back the matter to ensure the Noticee/Petitioners get a fair opportunity to be heard. The order of the Cou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....judicating Authority shall consider the same and pass such order, as it deems fit, after affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. 10. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 11. All pending applications are also disposed of." 7. The impugned demand orders dated 23rd April, 2024 and 5th December, 2023 are accordingly set aside. In response to show cause notices dated 04th December, 2023 and 23th September, 2023, the Petitioner shall file its replies within thirty days. The hearing notices shall now not be merely uploaded on the portal but shall also be e-mailed to the Petitioner and upon the hearing notice being received, the Petitioner would appear before the Department and make its submissions. The show....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI