Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

GST@8 – The Indian Tax Odyssey | Part II: The Federal Fabric – How GST Has Tested India’s Cooperative Spirit

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ST@8 – The Indian Tax Odyssey | Part II: The Federal Fabric – How GST Has Tested India’s Cooperative Spirit<br>By: - Navjot Singh<br>Goods and Services Tax - GST<br>Dated:- 5-7-2025<br>When India adopted the GST framework through the 101st Constitutional Amendment, it redefined not just how taxes were levied, but&nbsp;how sovereignty was shared. Eight years on, this framework continues to evolve-not just as an economic reform but as a&nbsp;constitutional experiment&nbsp;in cooperative federalism. I. Constitutional Balancing Act - The Birth of Dual GST The Indian Constitution originally envisaged a&nbsp;clear vertical separation of fiscal powers: List Taxing Power Examples Union List (List I) Central Government Excise, Service ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tax, Customs State List (List II) State Governments VAT, Luxury Tax, Entry Tax GST changed this landscape: * Article 246A&nbsp;gave&nbsp;simultaneous&nbsp;powers to both levels of government to legislate and collect GST. * This effectively created a&nbsp;dual GST model-CGST and SGST on intra-state supplies, and IGST on inter-state supplies. ??&nbsp;Key Insight:&nbsp;This was not mere delegation-it was&nbsp;co-sovereignty&nbsp;legislated into the Constitution. A rare innovation in federal taxation globally. II. GST Council - Constitutional Design vs. Practical Politics Article 279A Constituted the GST Council with Union Finance Minister as Chairperson and State FMs as Members While the Constitution envisaged a&nbsp;recommendator....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y&nbsp;role for the Council, in practice it has acted more like a&nbsp;quasi-legislative&nbsp;body. This raises foundational questions: * Are Council decisions binding?&nbsp;(SC in Mohit Minerals: No) * Should they override individual State autonomy? * What is the remedy if consensus fails? ??&nbsp;Judicial View:&nbsp;The Supreme Court in&nbsp;Union of India & Anr. Versus M/s Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Through Director [2022 (5) TMI 968 - Supreme Court]&nbsp;ruled that Council recommendations are not binding and merely "recommendatory", restoring some legislative autonomy to States. ??&nbsp;Tension Point:&nbsp;Without consensus-based decision-making, the Council risks becoming an arena for political contestation rather than cooperativ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e policy formulation. III. The Compensation Imbroglio - A Breach of Fiscal Trust? Under the&nbsp;GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, States were promised: "Compensation for any revenue shortfall below 14% compounded growth for 5 years (till June 2022), from a GST Compensation Cess Fund." Yet the&nbsp;COVID-era shortfall&nbsp;revealed systemic vulnerability: Original Promise Crisis Response States Reaction Direct compensation from cess proceeds Centre offered back-to-back loans citing 'Act of God' States like Kerala and Punjab protested dilution of statutory promise ??&nbsp;Constitutional Implication:&nbsp;The compensation promise was&nbsp;not merely fiscal-it was foundational, the "deal" that made States surrender their taxat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion powers. The erosion of this promise has led to&nbsp;demand for legislative review&nbsp;and a call for a&nbsp;more permanent fiscal adjustment mechanism&nbsp;under the Constitution. IV. Horizontal Fiscal Imbalance - The Rich-State Poor-State Divide GST was also intended to create&nbsp;fiscal neutrality across States, but disparities persist. State Type GST Dependency Issue Consumption-heavy States (Maharashtra, Karnataka) Less dependent Benefited from GST structure Manufacturing-heavy / Border States (Punjab, Gujarat) High dependency Lost edge due to origin-based tax being replaced ??&nbsp;Recommendation:&nbsp;India may need to explore a&nbsp;Finance Commission-style balancing fund&nbsp;to compensate structural imbalances th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at GST cannot address. V. Legal Uncertainties in Federal Interpretation Key unresolved legal questions include: * Can States deviate from GST Council recommendations? SC:&nbsp;Yes, but with caution. * What happens when Centre and States issue conflicting notifications? No mechanism for binding harmonization unless challenged in court. * Is dual control leading to violation of natural justice? Cases of parallel summons, conflicting audits, and duplicate investigations still abound. ??&nbsp;Urgent Need:&nbsp;A&nbsp;Centralized GST Dispute Resolution Bench, ideally under Article 323B, to adjudicate inter-governmental GST disputes. VI. Comparative Constitutional Insights Country GST Model Federal Principle Australia Single ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rate, administered centrally, shared revenues Strong federal structure; GST Council has statutory status Canada Dual GST (Federal and Provincial), optional adoption Provinces may opt-out (e.g., Alberta); GST not uniformly applied India Dual GST with simultaneous taxation powers Cooperative model; but Centre controls administration, funding, and tech infrastructure ??&nbsp;Observation:&nbsp;India's GST is the most&nbsp;complex yet ambitious federal GST model&nbsp;globally. But it lacks&nbsp;binding conflict-resolution machinery&nbsp;unlike its peers. VII. What Should Change - Strengthening the Federal Backbone Challenge Recommended Reform Centre-heavy policy agenda Empower an independent GST Council Secretariat Lack of intergov....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ernmental adjudication Establish GST Tribunal with federal benches Compensation-related trust deficit Constitutionally mandate post-2027 adjustment formula Legal uncertainty on Council powers Introduce constitutional clarification via Article 279A(8A) (proposed) VIII. Final Reflections - A Reform Worth Deepening GST has challenged and enriched Indian federalism. It has: * Brought States into fiscal decision-making&nbsp;like never before * Tested the resilience of political consensus * Exposed gaps in our constitutional mechanics But the journey is far from over. ??&nbsp;If GST 1.0 was about consolidation, then GST 2.0 must be about constitutional maturity. That includes federal fairness, judicial clarity, and policy stabilit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y. ------ CA Navjot Singh&nbsp; +91 9953357999<br> Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing by authors, experts, professionals ....