TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Set-off and Withholding of Tax Refunds : Clause 438 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 245 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ending. These provisions are central to the administration of direct tax refunds and reflect the balancing act between taxpayer rights and the protection of revenue interests. The evolution from Section 245 to Clause 438 demonstrates the legislature's response to administrative needs, judicial interpretations, and policy imperatives in tax administration. This commentary undertakes a detailed, provision-wise analysis of Clause 438, explores its objectives and practical implications, and provides a comparative analysis with the existing Section 245. The analysis also highlights significant legislative changes, their rationale, and the likely impact on stakeholders. Objective and Purpose The core objective of both Clause 438 and Sectio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... taxpayer against any outstanding tax liability under the Act. The language is broad, covering any refund arising under any provision of the Act and any sum "remaining payable." This ensures that tax authorities can administratively adjust dues without the need for separate recovery proceedings. The officers empowered under this clause include the Assessing Officer and various levels of Commissioners, reflecting the hierarchical structure of the tax administration. The discretion to set off is not automatic; it is an administrative decision but is circumscribed by procedural safeguards in subsequent sub-sections. Key Features: * Applies to any refund under the Act. * Empowers a range of tax officers. * Allows for partial or full set....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....holding of Refunds Text: "Where-(a) a part of the refund is set off under sub-section (1); or (b) no such amount is set off, and refund becomes due to a person, and the Assessing Officer, having regard to the fact that proceedings for assessment or reassessment are pending in the case of the person, may, for reasons to be recorded in writing and with the previous approval of the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner, withhold the refund up to sixty days from the date on which such assessment or reassessment is made." Analysis: This sub-section empowers the Assessing Officer to withhold the refund for up to sixty days if assessment or reassessment proceedings are pending. The exercise of this power is subject to two critical safeguard....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....for withholding refunds. * Time-bound Withholding: Both provisions limit the withholding period to sixty days from the date of assessment/reassessment. * Administrative Hierarchy: The same set of officers is empowered under both provisions, ensuring continuity in administrative practice. 2. Key Differences and Legislative Evolution * Omission of Revenue Prejudice Clause: * Earlier versions of Section 245 (prior to the 2024 amendment) allowed withholding of refunds if the Assessing Officer was of the opinion that granting the refund was "likely to adversely affect the revenue." This phrase was omitted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, aligning Section 245 more closely with the current language of Clause 438, which bases withholding ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... period is subject to judicial scrutiny. * The taxpayer has a right to challenge arbitrary or unjustified set-off or withholding by way of writ petitions or appeals. Clause 438, by retaining these safeguards, is designed to withstand judicial scrutiny and ensure that taxpayer rights are not compromised. 4. Comparative Perspective: Other Jurisdictions The power to set off refunds against outstanding dues is a common feature in tax legislation globally. For instance: * United Kingdom: HMRC can set off refunds against other tax debts under the Taxes Management Act, subject to notice requirements. * United States: The Internal Revenue Code permits the IRS to offset tax refunds against federal debts, with certain procedural protections.....