Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Legal and Practical Implications of Charging Interest on Excess Refunds under the Income Tax Regime : Clause 426 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 234D of the Income-tax Act, 1961

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rest and maintaining the integrity of the tax system. This commentary undertakes a detailed analysis of Clause 426, examining its objectives, structure, legal implications, and practical impacts, and provides a comprehensive comparative study with Section 234D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Objective and Purpose The primary legislative intent behind Clause 426 is to prevent unjust enrichment by taxpayers who receive refunds under provisional or summary assessments, which are later found to be excessive or unwarranted upon regular assessment. The provision operates as a deterrent against premature or erroneous refunds and aligns with the broader policy of ensuring fiscal discipline and equitable treatment of taxpayers. Historically, the int....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....partial months are considered, preventing taxpayers from exploiting minor timing differences. 3. Adjustment of Interest Liability Section 426(2) provides relief to the assessee where, as a result of appellate or revisionary orders (u/ss 287, 288, 359, 363, 365(10), 368, 377, or 378), the refund already granted is ultimately held to be correctly allowed, either in whole or in part. In such cases, the interest liability is reduced accordingly. This provision ensures that the interest burden is not unfairly imposed where the refund is ultimately justified, thus maintaining fairness and proportionality in the application of the law. 4. Definition of Regular Assessment Sub-section (3) clarifi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... excess refunds in largely identical circumstances. The core elements-triggering events, rate of interest, period of computation, and provision for reduction following appellate orders-are preserved in both provisions. 2. Cross-References and Legislative Updates The primary difference lies in the cross-referencing of sections. Clause 426 refers to Section 270(1) for refund grants and various sections (287, 288, etc.) for appellate or revisionary orders, while Section 234D refers to Section 143(1) for refunds and Sections 154, 155, 250, etc., for subsequent orders. This reflects the renumbering and restructuring of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, rather than a substantive change. 3. Rate of Interest Both provisions stipulate an interest rate ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....edecessors. 6. Retrospective Application Section 234D, by virtue of Explanation 2, explicitly applies to assessment years commencing before 1 June 2003 if proceedings are completed after that date. Clause 426 does not contain a similar provision, suggesting that it is intended to apply prospectively. This could have significant implications for transitional assessments and may require further legislative or administrative clarification. 7. Terminological and Procedural Evolution The terminology in Clause 426 has been updated to reflect the structure and vocabulary of the new Income Tax Bill, 2025. For instance, "tax year" replaces "assessment year," and new section numbers are used throughout. These changes are primarily formal but may ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r overlapping assessments. The provision's clarity in defining the start and end dates is helpful, but administrative guidance may be required to address edge cases. Practical Implications and Compliance Requirements * Taxpayer Awareness: Taxpayers must maintain accurate records of refunds received and monitor the status of assessments to anticipate potential interest liabilities. Professional advice may be required to navigate the new cross-references and transitional issues. * Administrative Preparedness: Tax authorities must update their systems to reflect the new statutory references and ensure that interest is computed and recovered in accordance with Clause 426. Training and guidance may be necessary to minimize errors and ....