Uniform Recovery Mechanisms in Indian Tax Law : Clause 419 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 229 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....horities have clear legal backing to recover dues in a manner consistent with the recovery of tax arrears. This commentary undertakes a comprehensive analysis of Clause 419, explores its legislative context and objectives, provides a detailed breakdown of its language and implications, and compares it with the existing Section 229. The analysis also delves into the practical ramifications for taxpayers and authorities, and discusses areas where clarification or reform may be warranted. Objective and Purpose The primary objective of provisions such as Clause 419 and Section 229 is to empower tax authorities with the ability to recover not just the principal tax amount, but also ancillary sums arising from non-compliance, delays, or breache....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....catch-all phrase to include any monetary liability under the Act, beyond tax, interest, or penalty. The use of "any sum imposed by way of..." ensures that the provision is not limited to sums specifically labelled as 'penalty' or 'fine,' but extends to all monetary exactions under the Act. 2. Mechanism for Recovery The clause stipulates that such sums "shall be recoverable in the manner provided in this Part for the recovery of arrears of tax." This cross-referencing ensures that the robust procedural safeguards, powers, and remedies available for tax arrears are equally applicable to the recovery of penalties, interest, and other sums. Typically, recovery mechanisms may include: * Attachment and sale of movable and im....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 2025: "Any sum imposed by way of interest, fine, penalty, or any other sum payable under the provisions of this Act, shall be recoverable in the manner provided in this Part for the recovery of arrears of tax." The language of both provisions is, for all practical purposes, identical, save for the reference to "this Chapter" in Section 229 and "this Part" in Clause 419. This difference is likely due to the restructuring of the Bill, where the relevant provisions may be grouped under a "Part" rather than a "Chapter." The substantive effect remains unchanged. Substantive Provisions and Legislative Continuity Both provisions aim to: * Ensure that penalties, interest, fines, and other sums are recoverable as tax arrears. * Apply the s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... direct and indirect taxes. Judicial Interpretation and Precedent Section 229 has been interpreted by courts as a clarificatory provision, designed to ensure that all sums due under the Act can be recovered using the same tools as for tax arrears. Courts have consistently upheld the validity of recovery proceedings for penalties and interest, provided the underlying liability has attained finality (i.e., is not subject to a pending appeal or stay). It is expected that Clause 419 will be interpreted in a similar manner, with courts likely to draw upon the body of case law developed u/s 229. Ambiguities and Issues in Interpretation While the provision is generally clear, certain interpretational issues may arise: * Scope of "other sums....