Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (1) TMI 98

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of recording songs and programmes on blank cassette tape does not bring into existence a commercially different commodity and the activity did not amount to "manufacture" within the meaning of sub-section (17) of Section 2 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959?" 2.The assessee deals in cassette-tapes. On 25th August, 1978, he purchased 1050 pieces of C-60 (red) cassette-tapes at the rate of Rs. 10/- per piece from one M/s. Teisco Electronics on payment of sales tax at the rate of 15 paise in a rupee. These cassettes were then given by the assessee to one M/s. Oriental Melodies for recording songs and programmes for which a sum of Rs. 5/- per cassette was charged by the said concern. From these cassettes, 35 cassettes with the pre-recorded so....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stored to their original condition of blank tapes. The Tribunal found merit in the above contentions of the assessee and held that by reason of the activity of recording songs and programmes on the blank cassette tapes, no physical change took place in the tapes, and the tapes, even after recording, remained tapes. No new commercially different commodity came into existence. It, therefore, held that the activity of recording songs and programmes on blank cassettes did not amount to "manufacture". Hence, this reference at the instance of the revenue. 4.We have carefully considered the submissions of the parties. There is no controversy in regard to the nature of the activity carried on by the assessee which comprises; inter alia, of purch....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ding to the State's interpretation, there will be a "manufacture". For instance, if a car is purchased and some special gadgets are added thereto, the interpretation will result in rendering the resale of the same car the resale of a different commodity. Again, if a piece of furniture is sold in a dismantled condition and the distributor puts the parts together and sells it, the definition, if construed as widely as interpreted by the State, can be said to amount to manufacture and render the furniture sold a different item of goods from the furniture purchased. This clearly is not the intention of the legislature..." The Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of interpreting the expression "manufacture" in a practical and workable manne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a like limitation on the words used by the statute because, if a very wide interpretation was given, it might lead to impractical consequences. The ratio of the above decision, in our opinion, squarely applies to the facts of the present case. Applying the same, it is difficult to hold that the activity of recording songs on blank cassettes for making them marketable would amount to manufacture. It can more appropriately be regarded as "processing". 5.The difference between "processing" and "manufacture" is by now well-understood and well recognised. "Processing" means subjecting a commodity to a process or treatment so as to develop it or make it fit for market. With each process, the original commodity undergoes a change. But it is on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n as shrimps, prawns and lobsters. The Court took note of the fact that processed shrimps, prawns and lobsters are the result of subjecting raw shrimps, prawns and lobsters to a certain degree of processing and held that even so they continued to possess their original character and identity notwithstanding the process undertaken on them to make them fit for the table. It was, therefore, held that processing of prawns for making them fit for the market is not process of manufacture. 6.The ratio of the above decisions is clear that every process undertaken by the assessee on the goods to make them fit for the market for improving their marketability does not amount to process of manufacture. The legal position that emerges from the decisi....