TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Comparative Analysis of Tax Recovery and Default Provisions : Clause 411 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 220 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....411, elucidating its objectives, mechanics, and practical implications, and juxtaposes each aspect with the corresponding provisions of Section 220. The comparative analysis aims to highlight both the continuity and the changes, and to assess their likely impact on taxpayers, tax administrators, and the broader tax compliance environment. Objective and Purpose The legislative intent behind both Clause 411 and Section 220 is to ensure the prompt and efficient recovery of tax dues, while simultaneously providing essential safeguards for taxpayers against arbitrary or unduly harsh recovery actions. These provisions balance the imperative of revenue protection with the taxpayer's right to procedural fairness, by stipulating clear timelines, consequences for non-compliance, avenues for relief (such as extension of time or payment by instalments), and the possibility of waiver or reduction of interest in appropriate cases. The historical context of Section 220 reflects the need to codify a structured process for tax recovery, which has been periodically refined through legislative amendments and judicial interpretation. Clause 411, as introduced in the 2025 Bill, seeks to consolid....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 411(13) and section 220(6)). * The explicit reference to the 1964 Act ensures continuity and legal certainty in the recovery process, even where the underlying assessment is under challenge. 3. Interest on Default Clause 411(3): * If the demand is not paid within the stipulated period, the assessee is liable to pay simple interest at 1% per month or part thereof, calculated from the day after the end of the period until payment. Section 220(2): * Imposes interest at 1% per month or part thereof (current rate, subject to historical amendments), on similar terms. * Includes provisos regarding reduction/refund of interest if the assessed amount is reduced on appeal or rectification, and liability for additional interest if the amount is subsequently increased. * Also provides for a higher rate (1.5%) for periods post-31 March 1989, for earlier demands. Comparison and Commentary: * Clause 411 maintains the 1% rate, mirroring the current statutory rate u/s 220, thereby preserving continuity and predictability for taxpayers. * Sub-sections (6) and (7) of Clause 411 incorporate the mechanism for adjustment of interest in line with appellate or rectification outcomes, as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....est liability is dynamically adjusted in accordance with the final determination of tax liability, thereby upholding the principles of fairness and equity. * The list of relevant sections has been updated in Clause 411 to reflect the new legislative framework, but the underlying mechanism is the same. 7. Higher Rate of Interest for Pre-1989 Periods Clause 411(7): * Specifies that for periods commencing on or before 31 March 1989 and ending after that date, the interest rate shall be 1.5% per month for the period after 31 March 1989. Section 220(2) (Third Proviso): * Contains an identical provision. Comparison and Commentary: * This transitional provision is a legacy from earlier amendments and is retained for completeness, though its practical relevance is now limited to legacy cases. 8. Waiver or Reduction of Interest Clause 411(8)-(10): * Empowers the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner/Principal Commissioner/Commissioner to reduce or waive interest if satisfied that: (a) payment would cause genuine hardship; (b) default was due to circumstances beyond the assessee's control; and (c) the assessee has co-operated in assessment/recovery proceedings. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... deferment of recovery in bona fide cases where the assessment is under challenge, subject to the AO's satisfaction and imposition of suitable conditions (such as furnishing security or partial payment). * Judicial pronouncements have repeatedly underscored that this discretion must be exercised judiciously, and not as a matter of course or in a mechanical fashion. 12. Special Provisions for Foreign Income and Remittance Restrictions Clause 411(14)-(15): * Where the assessee is assessed on income arising outside India in a country with remittance restrictions, the AO shall not treat the assessee as in default for the part of tax attributable to such income, until the restriction is lifted. * Defines when income is deemed to be brought into India (if utilized for expenditure outside India or brought in any form). Section 220(7) and Explanation: * Contains identical provisions and explanation. Comparison and Commentary: * This provision recognizes the practical difficulties faced by taxpayers in remitting funds from jurisdictions with exchange controls, and prevents penal consequences for circumstances beyond their control. * The explanation ensures that the benef....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssessment of "genuine hardship" and "circumstances beyond control" remain subjective, requiring judicial interpretation. * The anti-overlap clause for interest is clarified, but coordination with other charging provisions (e.g., for TDS/TCS) may still require administrative guidance. Practical Implications The provisions of Clause 411, like Section 220, have significant implications for all stakeholders: * For Taxpayers: The timelines and consequences for default are clear, but avenues for relief (extension, instalments, waiver/reduction of interest) are preserved. Procedural safeguards (right to be heard, timelines for disposal, discretion pending appeal) are critical in ensuring fairness. * For Tax Authorities: The provisions provide a robust legal framework for prompt recovery, while also equipping officers with necessary discretion to address genuine hardship or practical difficulties. * For the Legal System: The retention and clarification of key principles, as developed through legislative amendments and judicial interpretation, foster legal certainty and reduce scope for litigation. Comparative Analysis and Unique Features While Clause 411 is, in substance, a con....