Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 1950

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: "1 In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the Learned Assessing Officer in rejecting the books of accounts u/s 145(3) of the IT Act, 1961 merely on the ground of non-maintenance of stock register. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the Learned Assessing Officer in rejecting the books of accounts u/s 145(3) of the IT Act, 1961 without pointing out any defect in the maintenance of books of accounts. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Learned CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the trading addition of Rs. 3,59,72,920/- made by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vant details, such as cash book, bank book, ledger, journal ledger, sale and purchase ledgers and supporting vouchers etc. It was also explained to the AO that all the receipts were through banking channels, and mostly from the Government authorities. Further that all the expenditure was subjected to TDS and mostly paid through banking channel. 5. The AO, however, observed that the assessee has not maintained day-to-day stock register. 6. The assessee explained to the AO that the assessee was engaged in construction and maintenance of roads, rails, bridges etc., and that in the nature of the business of the assessee, it was not possible to maintain day-to-day stock register. 7. The AO, however, did not get satisfied with the above reply ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or sales in this case. The only reasons found by the AO for rejecting the books of accounts is that the assessee had not maintained day-to-day stock register. The assessee in this respect has already explained that in the nature of business of the assessee, it was not possible to maintain such day-to-day register. 10. So far as the low GP rate for the year under consideration is concerned, the assessee in this respect has relied on the following chart: S.No A.Y. 2018-19 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2016-17 Remarks Turnover (Rs) 984899302 2026016329 645462528 51626036~ The N.P. rate disclosed by the assessee during the year is all time high and is better in comparison to earlier two years. Gross Profit (Rs) 20067850 142442200 G.P. Rat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ls and the TDS duly deducted on the expenditure. The AO has not pointed any defect or infirmity in the books of accounts of the assessee nor about the sales and expenditure recorded by the assessee. Merely because, the GP rate for the under consideration is low as compared to the earlier years, that itself, cannot be the ground to reject the books of accounts. The reliance in this respect can be placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Smt.Poonam Rani, 326 ITR 0223, wherein, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that in the absence of any finding that the assessee has inflated the cost of raw-material or the cost of processing or that he has made out of books sales of finished goods and suppressed sales,....