Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

FERA violations upheld for share transactions without RBI approval as daughters classified as non-resident persons

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The HC dismissed appeals challenging FERA violations involving share transactions by an Indian company without RBI approval. The court determined that the Shroff daughters, who had traveled to the USA on student visas, were "persons resident outside India" rather than "persons resident in India" at the relevant time. This classification was based on evidence indicating their intention to stay abroad indefinitely, including their marriages to USA-settled persons and uncertain return plans. The court applied the animus manendi test and noted that Section 71 FERA places the burden of proving requisite permissions on the accused. Documentary evidence established contraventions of Sections 9, 19, and 29 read with Section 68 FERA. The court rejected arguments regarding disproportionate penalties given the transaction magnitude and upheld the Special Director's and Tribunal's factual findings.....