Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 1940

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Revenue : Adjournment Application filed ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the order dated 28.09.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax [Exemption] denying registration under section 80G of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an Ed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 58,05,555/-, but whereas it was donations made to two Trusts namely Shri Saurashtra Patel Samaj Charitable Trust, Saurashtra of Rs. 50,00,000/- and Uma Arogya Seva Foundation for Rs. 2,50,000/- and Chief Minister Relief Fund of Rs. 5,55,555/-. Further the donations made to the Trust do not carry any religious activities and are also not meant for any particular caste or community. The Assessee Tr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd in law, the learned CIT(Exemption) has grievously erred in rejecting the application for approval u/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Act on erroneous premises. 2. That on facts and in law, the application made u/s. 80G(5)(iii) ought to have been granted as prayed for. 3. The appellant craves liberty to add, alter, amend any ground of appeal. 5. Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee c....