Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Gold bars seizure overturned as department failed proving foreign origin despite 99.5% purity without corroborative evidence

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding seizure of six gold bars weighing 499.17 grams from appellant's possession at Guwahati Railway Station. The tribunal held that 99.5% purity alone cannot establish foreign origin without corroborative evidence. Since this was a town seizure, Section 123 presumption was inapplicable, placing burden on department to prove smuggling. Department failed to establish foreign origin or smuggled nature with evidence. Appellant provided documentary proof of domestic purchase from M/s. Nirmala Trading Company and demonstrated internal transfer between business units. Minor variations in employee statements could not override documentary evidence of licit purchase. Confiscation order and penalty of Rs.1,60,000 under Section 112(b)(i) of Customs Act, 1962 were set aside due to established domestic purchase.....