Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 1794

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....thorities have erred in making an addition of Rs. 22,09,817/- on account of disallowance of depreciation, by disregarding the appellant submission, the claim of deprecation is fully allowable as per the provisions of law, and therefore disallowance of depreciation, amounting to Rs. 22,09,817/- be allowed in full. Your appellant prays for deletion of entire addition. Your appellant craves for to add, alter amend, modify, delete any or all grounds of appeal before or during the course of hearing in the interest of natural justice." 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a cooperative society originally engaged in the manufacture of sugar and subsequently leased out its factory to other for the purposes of manufac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....18 and hence was not eligible to can deprecation on the asset. The assessment 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Act was completed on 05.04.2021 by assessing the total income Rs. 22,09,817 by disallowing the claim of depreciations 5.1. The AO held that as the appellant is not operating the sugar factory for production and had leased it out from F.Y 2013-14 onwards, the appellant was not eligible to claim depreciation from this asset u/s 32 of the I.T.Act, 1961. 5.2. The appellant has relied on the Indian Accounting Standard 19 claiming that the lessor is eligible to claim depreciation on the leased asset. The appellant further justified the claim for depreciation stating that though the factory was leased out, it was s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... CIT(A) allowing depreciation. Ld. AR submitted that the return for assessment year 2017-18 was also subject to scrutiny but no such disallowance of depreciation was made by the Assessing Officer. It was contended before the Bench that the assets were leased out for the purposes of manufacturing of sugar and cane crushing that is for business purposes and the assets were admittedly owned by the assessee since the depreciation claimed was allowed in earlier years also. Ld. AR relied on the order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of IndusInd Bank Ltd vs. Addl. CIT, Special Range, Mumbai [2012] 19 taxmann.com 173 (Mumbai) wherein it was held that only the lessee can be treated as owner of the asset in case of a finance ....