Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Assessee's actual gross profit rate of 16.22% applied to differential turnover instead of CIT(A)'s 15% estimate

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT addressed differential turnover where assessee declared lower turnover compared to Form 26QB and audit report Form 3CA. AO added entire differential amount to total income. CIT(A) restricted addition to profit element at 15% of differential receipts. ITAT held that since assessee's P&L Account reflected net material consumption considering opening/closing work-in-progress, entire differential amount cannot constitute income. Given assessee's declared gross profit rate of 16.22%, ITAT modified CIT(A)'s order directing AO to compute income using 16.22% gross profit rate instead of 15%. Revenue's appeal partly allowed with profit computation adjusted to reflect assessee's actual gross profit margin rather than CIT(A)'s conservative estimate.....