Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

CESTAT rejects interest claim on customs refund when complete documentation submitted within statutory timeframe under Section 27A

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CESTAT dismissed Appellant's claim for interest on refund arising from provisional assessment under Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that interest under Section 27A is payable only when refund is not sanctioned within three months from receipt of complete refund claim and supporting documents. Following Karnataka HC precedent in Commissioner of Customs Mangaluru v JSW Steel Ltd, CESTAT determined that Appellant cannot claim undue advantage from delays caused by incomplete documentation submissions. The proper officer had issued deficiency notice and sanctioned refund within statutory timeframe after receiving Appellant's complete response. CESTAT upheld the impugned order rejecting interest claim, ruling that no delayed refund payment occurred as refund was processed timely per Section 27 requirements once complete documentation was provided.....