Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 1170

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....siness Auxiliary Service. Appellant is engaged in collecting and forwarding of goods by air and sea and registered under the category of Custom House Agent, Storage Warehouse Service, Business Auxiliary Service. On scrutiny of the records maintained by the appellant, it is observed that appellant is receiving certain consideration from airlines out of the freight payable by the exporter and it is considered as performance incentives. Alleging that such consideration is classifiable under 'Business Auxiliary Service', proceedings were initiated. Further, it is observed that the appellant is also engaged with companies/freight forwarders functioning in foreign countries for operation, arrangement on import of cargo and collect freight charges....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Services Ltd. Vs. Commissioner: 2019 (24) GSTL 664 (Tri.) * Direct Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner: 2021 (55) GSTL 344 (Tribunal) * DHL Lemuir-Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE: 2017 (47) STR 309 (Tri.-Mum.) * CST vs. Karan Freight Movers: 2017 (4) GSTL 215 (Tri.-Del.) 2.1 As regarding the demand of Rs.7,74,594/-, learned counsel fairly admits that appellant is not disputing the said demand and as per the impugned order, service tax liability of Rs.7,74,594/- has been discharged by the appellant along with interest of Rs.4,54,417/-. 2.2 As regarding the demand of Rs.1,25,662/- under the category of 'Business Support Service', the learned counsel drew our attention to the invoice issued by the British Airways on 31.08.2007 where....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... limitation. 3. Learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that adjudicating authority had categorically held that since the amount received by the appellant as consideration is nothing but Business Support Service and Business Auxiliary Service and such incentives are provided only for enhancing the business activity of the airlines. Thus, by extending such incentives, appellant is promoting and marketing the airlines. Thus the performance incentives received by the appellant has to be considered as consideration for providing taxable service. 4. Heard both sides. The issue is whether the incentives received from airliners/shipping lines are liable to service tax under the category of Business Auxiliary Services and collec....