Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 1003

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ection 138 of the Act. 2. Precisely, the facts of the case as emerge from the record are that respondent/complainant (for short 'complainant') filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'Act') in the competent court of law, alleging therein that accused with a view to discharge his liability, had issued cheque amounting to Rs.35,000/- in his favour, but fact remains that aforesaid cheque on its presentation was dishonoured on account of insufficient funds in the account of the accused. Since, despite having received demand notice accused failed to make the payment good within the time stipulated in the legal notice, complainant was compelled to initiate proceedings under Section 138 of the Act, in th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... while acknowledging the aforesaid factum of compromise, states that since complainant has received the entire compensation amount from the accused, he shall have no objection in case the judgments of conviction and sentence passed by the courts below as well as this Court are quashed and set aside and the petitioner is acquitted of the charge framed against him 7. While considering the prayer made in the application, the question which needs to be decided at first instance is that "whether after upholding the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by learned court below, this Court proceed to compound the offence or not?." 8. This Court vide judgment passed in Cr.MP No. 1197 of 2017 in Cr. Revision No. 394 of 2015 titled....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iminal misc. application under section 482 Cr.P.C read with section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act( for short the 'Act') with a prayer to review/recall the order dated 6.10.2016 passed by this Court in SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1267/2016 in the light of compromise dated 4.11.2016 subsequently entered between the parties and as a consequences thereof to acquit the accused petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Vide order dated 6.10.2016, the aforesaid revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court while upholding and affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court as well as by the Appellate Court. It was jointly submitted by the learned counse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act are set aside and as a consequence thereof he is acquitted therefrom." 9. Reliance is also placed upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, wherein similar application came to be filed for recalling the judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat. In the aforesaid judgment, Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, has reiterated that judgment passed by the High Court affirming the judgment of conviction recorded under Section 138 of the Act, can be recalled in view of the specific provisions contained in Section 147 of the Act, which provides for compounding of offence allegedly committed under Section 138 of the Act. 10. The Hon'ble Apex Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this Court is of the opinion that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the petitioner should be permitted to compound the offence committed by him under Section 138 of the Code." 11. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment has categorically held that in view of the provisions contained under Section 147 of the Act, read with Section 320 of Cr.P.C, compromise arrived inter se the parties, can be accepted and offence committed under Section 138 of the Act, can be ordered to be compounded. Hon'ble Apex Court in Damodar S. Prabhu V. Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663, has categorically held that offence punish....