2025 (6) TMI 904
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO For the Appellant: Mr. Thanneru Chaitanya Kumar, Learned Counsel. For the Respondent: None. JUDGMENT PER (THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE) 1. Mr. Parsa Ananth Nageswar Rao, learned counsel appears for Mr. Thanneru Chaitanya Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Heard on the question of admission. 3. This appeal under Section 260A o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the total income. 5. Being aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who affirmed the order passed by the Assessing Officer. The assessee, thereupon, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad (for short 'the Tribunal'). The Tribunal, by order dated 06.12.2012, remitted the matter to the Commissioner of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ee to adduce the material. Accordingly, the orders passed by the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were upheld. 8. Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee ought to have been granted one more opportunity to adduce evidence. 9. We have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant. 10. In pursuance of the order of remand, th....