Corporate Money Laundering Case: Bail Granted Due to Insufficient Evidence and Lack of Direct Involvement in Predicate Offence

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

Corporate Money Laundering Case: Bail Granted Due to Insufficient Evidence and Lack of Direct Involvement in Predicate Offence

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....HC granted bail in money laundering case involving corporate resolution plan. Court found insufficient evidence to deny bail, noting: (1) applicant not named in original charge sheet, (2) predicate offence not conclusively established, (3) main alleged beneficiary remains unarrested, and (4) co-accused with similar alleged role already granted bail. Court emphasized bail as default principle and ordered release upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two similar sureties, subject to standard bail conditions. The bail order underscores procedural fairness and requirement of substantive evidence in economic offence proceedings under PMLA.....

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Corporate Money Laundering Case: Bail Granted Due to Insufficient Evidence and Lack of Direct Involvement in Predicate Offence