Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... relevant facts as could be gathered from the impugned Order--in--Original are that the appellant is engaged in the activity of services relating to interior decoration in respect of Commercial or Industrial or Residential buildings, which according to the appellant were in the nature of Completion and Finishing services involving the services like glazing, plastering, painting, flooring, wall tiling etc. which according to them was under Works Contract Service (WCS). In the Order--in--Original, we see the admission by the Commissioner as to the fact of the appellants raising the invoices on its customer in which it had remitted VAT on 79.85% of the value of the invoice on a notional basis and service tax on 20.15% of the remaining value. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d take us through the order of this Bench in the appellant's own case for an earlier period wherein this Bench vide its Final Order No.41241/2019 dated 31.10.2019 has considered the binding judicial precedence of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Safety Retreading Co. (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem reported in 2017 (48) S.T.R. 97 (SC) and other rulings of CESTAT Benches, to hold that the calculation of payment of service tax by the appellant was in order. The relevant observations are as under : "7.1 The second issue is with regard to the method of calculation in arriving at the value of taxable service for payment of Service Tax under Works Contract Service. For better appreciation, the relevant provision....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntract; (vi) cost of establishment of the contractor relatable to supply of labour and services; (vii) other similar expenses relatable to supply of labour and services; and (viii) profit earned by the service provider relatable to supply of labour and services; (ii) Where Value Added Tax or sales tax, as the case may be, has been paid on the actual value of transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of the works contract, then such value adopted for the purposes of payment of Value Added Tax or sales tax, as the case may be, shall be taken as the value of transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of the said works contract for determining the value of works contract service und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eventy percent of the total amount charged for the works contract; (C) in case of other works contracts, not covered under sub--clauses (A) and (B), including maintenance, repair, completion and finishing services such as glazing, plastering, floor and wall tiling, installation of electrical fittings of an immovable property, service tax shall be payable on sixty per cent. of the total amount charged for the works contract;" 7.2 Perusal of these provisions, as shown above, would indicate that Rule 2A continues after 2012 also and the Composition Scheme has been replaced and inbuilt in the Rules itself in a different form whereby the service portion in Works Contract is specified at a percentage of gross value based on the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessee is liable to pay Service Tax only on the service component, which under the State Act was quantified at 30%. It was held that the assessee is not liable to pay Service Tax on the total amount for retreading including the value of materials/goods that have been used and sold in execution of the contract. 8.2 The Tribunal in the case of M/s. Singh Sales and Services Vs. Commr. of Cus., C.Ex. & S.T., Allahabad reported in 2017 (52) S.T.R. 38 (Tri. -- Allahabad) has held that value of goods/spare parts supplied and used for providing service are not includible in the taxable value. 8.3 In M/s. Sobha Developers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C.Ex. & S.Tax, Bangalore reported in 2010 (19) S.T.R. 75 (Tri. -- Bang.) it was....