Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

Procedural Innovations in Tax Compliance : Clause 263(2)(a) of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 139D of the Income-tax Act, 1961

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3(2)(a) reflects the legislative intent to adapt to technological advancements, enhance compliance, and address emerging challenges in tax administration. This commentary undertakes a detailed analysis of Clause 263(2)(a), explores its objectives, key features, and implications, and provides a comparative analysis with the existing Section 139D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, highlighting continuities, departures, and the broader policy context. Objective and Purpose The primary objective of both Clause 263(2)(a) and Section 139D is to provide a statutory framework for the procedural aspects of filing income tax returns. The legislative intent is threefold: * To empower the CBDT to prescribe rules for electronic filing, thereby promoting ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....scribe classes of persons is particularly significant in the context of increasing digital penetration, but also recognizes the digital divide that persists in India. (ii) Form and Manner of Furnishing Returns This sub-clause authorizes the Board to prescribe the format (including electronic templates and schemas) and the procedural steps for filing returns. The "form" may include not only the structure of the return but also the nature and detail of information required. The "manner" covers submission processes, verification (including electronic signatures, Aadhaar-based verification, etc.), and acknowledgment protocols. This provision is essential for: * Ensuring uniformity and standardization in return filings. * Facilitating int....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng technologies such as blockchain or API-based integrations in the future. Comparison with Section 139D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Structural and Substantive Similarities * Both provisions delegate to the CBDT the power to make rules regarding electronic filing, the form and manner of submission, supporting documentation, and technological infrastructure. * The core elements-classification of persons, procedural aspects, and post-filing requirements-are retained in both. * Both provisions reflect a policy preference for electronic filing, with flexibility to adapt to different taxpayer categories and technological capabilities. Key Differences and Enhancements in Clause 263(2)(a) * Scope of Application: * Section 139D is limi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nded scope of Clause 263(2)(a) aligns with global best practices in tax administration, particularly the move towards comprehensive electronic filing, risk-based assessments, and data-driven compliance. Comparative Table  Aspect Clause 263(2)(a) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Section 139D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Scope Comprehensive; covers form, manner, verification, supporting documents, and additional particulars Limited to e-filing; covers class of persons, form/manner, supporting documents, and transmission resource Disclosure Requirements Explicit provision for additional disclosures (assets, expenditures, bank accounts, audit reports, etc.) No explicit provision for additional disclosures Verification ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a quality and analytics capabilities, enabling more effective risk assessment and targeted scrutiny. * Reduced processing times and administrative costs due to automation and digital workflows. * Improved ability to detect non-compliance, tax evasion, and fraud through cross-verification with other databases. * Flexibility to update procedures and requirements in response to policy changes or technological advancements. For the Legal System * Reduced litigation on procedural grounds, as the Board's rule-making powers are now more explicit and comprehensive. * Scope for judicial review remains, particularly if rules are arbitrary or discriminatory, but the legislative framework is clearer. Ambiguities and Issues in Interpreta....