Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1991 (10) TMI 64

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f years and a fine of Rs. 75,000/- or in default SI for six months under the second count. 2.The case of the prosecution in brief is that the petitioner on 6-4-1990 at IGI Airport, New Delhi from Frankfurt by flight No. LH-700. She tried to pass through the green channel. Near the exit gate she was intercepted by R.K. Parasar, Air Customs Officer. On enquiry she denied carrying any contraband articles. She was then asked to pass through the metal detector which indicated presence of some high density metal on her person. The petitioner was then subjected to search by a lady customs officer in presence of two more ladies. The search resulted in the recovery of 100 gold biscuits with foreign markings, weighing 10 tolas each concealed in thre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and etc. v. Abdulkadar Ancalnani Masmani and Others - 1991 (55) E.L.T. 497 (Guj.) = 1985 Crl. L.J. 324 (Vol. 91) and V.P. Sayed Mohmmed v. Asstt. Collector of Central Excise, Calicut, 1973 Crl. L.J. 1551 (Volume 79). I have carefully gone through both these authorities. These are not at all attracted to the facts of the present case. In the first case the recovery was of foreign origin synthetic fabrics from a residential premises under the reasonable belief that the said goods were of foreign origin and as such smuggled goods and liable to confiscation. The recovery was also by the Superintendent of the Customs department. He was held to be not a proper officer and therefore, the seizure could not be said to be covered under Section 123 o....