Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (7) TMI 1577

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, for the sake of convenience, these appeals are being heard together and disposed off, by this consolidated order. 2. The assessee has, more or less, raised common grounds of appeal for both the assessment years. Therefore, for the sake of brevity, grounds of appeal filed for the AY 2010-11, are re-produced as under: 1. For that the Order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is contrary to law, facts and circumstances of the case 2. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in upholding the action of Assessing Officer in treating the Loan received from individuals amounting to Rs.1,12,94,904/- as bogus. For these grounds and such other grounds that may be adduced before or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the genuineness of the loans, the AO has made additions towards unsecured loans, and consequent interest paid on said loans. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the First Appellate Authority, but could not succeed. The Ld.CIT(A) for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 01.08.2022, partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by observing that when the additions made towards loans and advances, includes interest paid/credited on said loans, then separate additions towards interest is not required. Thus, directed the AO to delete separate addition of Rs.2,94,904/- towards interest and sustained addition made towards unsecured loans. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld.CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 5....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gus accommodation entries in the form of share capitals and loans from Kolkata Companies, and there is a direct link between entries obtained from Kolkata Companies in the case of group companies and loans taken by the assessee. Further, although, there is no direct reference to any incriminating material, the fact remains that the assessee was rotating funds from alleged entry providers in the form of loans which constitutes incriminating material, and thus, there is no merit in additional grounds filed by the assessee and same should be rejected. He further submits that the assessee could not file any evidences in support of various unsecured loans claims to have been received from certain parties, and thus, the AO & the Ld.CIT(A) has rig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d income in the form of unsecured loans taken from various persons. However, the AO has referred to modus operandi employed by the assessee and its group in taking bogus entries of unsecured loans and share capital from Kolkata Companies and same has been referred to in the order of the Ld.CIT(A). But, fact remains that in order to make any addition in the assessment framed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.153A of the Act, incriminating material for each assessment year is must if such assessment is unabated/completed on the date of search. In this case, there is no dispute with regard to fact that the assessment for AY 2010-11 is unabated/concluded on the date of search, because, the due date for issue of notice u/s.143(2) of the Act, was expired on 30.11....