Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 1759

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate for the appellant Ms. Jaya Kumari, Authorized Representative for the Department ORDER P. V. SUBBA RAO This appeal is filed by M/s Lakshya Technocon Pvt. Ltd. appellant to assail the order-in-appeal dated 28.09.2018 impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Jodhpur, whereby he upheld the order-in-original dated 28.04.2017 OIO passed by the Deputy Commissioner and rejected the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 75 of the Finance Act. It was also proposed to impose penalties under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. 4. The appellant resisted these proposals which were, however, confirmed by the Deputy Commissioner in his OIO dated 28.04.2017. The appellant's main contention was that it was not liable to pay service tax as it had rendered services as a sub-contractor and the main contractor had already....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....res-integra. In view of the conflicting decisions of this question, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi versus M/s Melange Developers Pvt. Ltd. 2020 (33) G.S.T.L. 116 (Tri. LB). It was decided that the sub-contractor had to pay service tax on the services rendered by him and the main contractor could to take Cenvat credit....