Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 1630

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....No. 400/2021 titled Commissioner of Customs v. M/s Canon India Private Limited. The same has now been decided by the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Review Petition No. 400/2021 titled Commissioner of Customs v. M/s Canon India Private Limited (hereinafter "Cannon - II") pronounced on 7th November, 2024. The Supreme Court, vide the said judgment, has categorically held that DRI Officers would be 'proper officers' for the purposes of the Customs Act, 1962. 3. The observations in Canon-II as under : "168.In view of the aforesaid discussion, we conclude that: [...] (vi) Subject to the observations made in this judgment, the officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Commissionerates of Customs (Preventive), D....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....respective High Court shall grant eight weeks' time to the respective assessee to prefer appropriate appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). d. Where the writ petitions have been disposed of by the High Court and appeals have been preferred against them which are pending before this Court, they shall be disposed of in accordance with this decision and this Court shall grant eight weeks' time to the respective assessee to prefer appropriate appeals before the CESTAT. e. Where the orders of CESTAT have been challenged before this Court or the respective High Court on the ground of maintainability due to lack of jurisdiction of the proper officer to issue show cause notices, this Court or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dated 9th January, 2020 and the remaining 6 appeals, including the Petitioner's appeal was not duly heard. The Petitioner has subsequently sought rectification of the order on the said ground. However, the said rectification application has been dismissed on 22nd April, 2022 with the following observations : "An application has been filed by the Appellant for rectification of mistake in the Final Order dated January 01, 2020. 2. It is stated that though in the opening paragraph of the order it has been mentioned that "these 30 appeals have been preferred by importer-appellant, exporter appellants, Prabir Ghosh and also the Revenue against the adjudication orders detailed below", but the chart that has been prepared in this....