Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 1515

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....site party. 3. Learned ACSC for the revisionist submits that the issue in hand is squarely covered with the decision of this Court passed in a bunch of cases leading Sales/ Trade Tax Revision No. 10 of 2025 (The Commissioner, Commercial Tax, UP Vs. S/S Janki Industries Nai Basti, Bareilly), Neutral Citation No. 2025: AHC:42271. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the judgement passed in the case of S/S Janki Industries (supra) requires reconsideration as the same is based upon the judgement passed by this Court in the case of M/s Farooq Agencies Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax (Sales / Trade Tax Revision No. 397/2013 decided on 16.7.2013). He submits that the facts of M/s Farooq Agencies (supra) is not ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sangeeta Singh (supra) are not applicable in the facts of the present case. 8. He further submits that the judgement cited by the counsel for the opposite party in the case of R. Hanumathappa (supra) is related to Mysore Income Tax Act and the counsel for the opposite party has failed to show that the provisions of Mysore Income Tax Act are analogous to the VAT Act and GST Act. In the event, the provisions are not analogous, the judgement is of no aid to the opposite party. 9. He further submits that once the opposite party has filed TRANS From 1, it had intention to avail the ITC but since the goods in question are exempted under the GST Act, has reversed the same by filing Form GST TRAN -2, therefore, the impugned order has been passed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d goods are not re-sold, the input tax credit cannot be accorded to the registered dealer as per Section 13. On the said premise, this Court has passed the order in favour of the Revenue and against the registered dealer in the case of S/S Janki Industries (supra). 13. The case in hand, it is admitted by the opposite party that there was a closing stock as on 30.6.2020, which shows that the goods purchased by the opposite party, have not been re-sold. Input tax credit availed with the dealer was transferred under the GST Act in Form GST TRAN -1. It is also not in dispute that the opposite party realises that he cannot claim the input tax credit as available to him then he filed Form GST TRAN -2 reversing the same input tax. Section 13 of t....