TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (5) TMI 1367
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Appellant: Mr. Kaushik Dey, Adv. Mr. Abhradip Maity, Adv. Ms. Shatabdi Sen, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Shovit Betal, Adv. The Court :- This application has been filed to condone the delay in filing the application for restoration and to restore the appeal which was dismissed for non prosecution by order dated 28th June, 2024. 2. We have perused the reasons given by the applicant....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....stantial questions of law : "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the fixed facility charge claimed by the assessee as an input was admissible under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 ? (2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal erred in allowing the said charge as claimed as an input by the assessee ?" 5. We have elaborately heard the lea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ublic Sector Undertaking and entered into an agreement with M/s. Goyel MG Gases (P) Ltd. during the period 2004-09. The revenue was of the opinion that the duty paid on fixed facility charges cannot be made available as CENVAT credit to the assessee as the said payment of duty has no nexus with the manufacture of the finished goods by the assessee in their factory premises and in this regard, the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d, the revenue cannot take a different view in the matter though the only distinction in the instant case is that the fixed facility charges is in respect of the facility which was provided for supply of liquid oxygen whereas in the other case it was liquid nitrogen. That apart, the clarification issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs dated November 10, 2014 also comes to the aid and as....