TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (5) TMI 1422
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sed of. ITA 134/2025 & CM APPL. 27604/2025 (Exemption) 3. The Revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act], inter alia, impugning the order dated ITA 134/2025 Page 2 of 8 30.09.2024 [impugned order] passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [ITAT] in ITA No.2562/Del/2023 in respect of the Assessment Year [AY] 2011-12 captioned Garg Acrylics Limited v. DCIT. 4. The Assessee had preferred the aforesaid appeal impugning the order dated 04.01.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana [CIT(A)] dismissing the assessee's appeal against the assessment order dated 30.11.2018 passed under Section 147 read with Section 143 (3) of the Act. 5. The present case in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... assessing the Assessee's income for the AY 2011-12 at Rs. 32,07,74,970/-. The AO made an addition at the rate of 20 percent of the amount of the purchases, which according to the AO were made from the concerned vendors. 8. The Assessee appealed the said decision before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) passed an order dated 24.07.2018 restricting the disallowance to 16.26 percent of the purchases in question instead of 20 percent, as assessed by the AO. 9. The Assessee appealed the said CIT(A)'s order dated 24.07.2018 before the learned ITAT. The Revenue also preferred a cross appeal against the said order to the extent that the CIT(A) had restricted the disallowance. The learned ITAT had allowed the Assessee's appeal and dismissed the appeal fi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he purchases made by the Assessee were bogus, but also enhanced the disallowance from 20 percent to the entire amount of the purchases of Rs. 1,62,13,633/- under Section 69C of the Act. It is material to note that the CIT(A) held that the said suppliers were nonexistent. 14. The Assessee appealed the said decision dated 31.05.2023 of the CIT(A) before the learned ITAT, which is allowed in terms of the impugned order. 15. A plain reading of the order dated 31.05.2023 passed by the CIT(A) indicates that the CIT(A) was moved by the assessment orders made in the case of two persons from whom allegedly bogus purchases were made by the Assessee. It was noted that the assessment orders framed in respect of the said two persons indicated that lar....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t of Rs 47,91,307/- during the year to M/s Ramesh Kumar Tarun Kumar, Prop. Tarun Kumar on account of purchase of cotton. As per another information received from the said office of the ITO (Investigation), Gurgaon, that a sum of Rs 1,14,22,326/- has also been received by Shri Kaushal Kumar Jain, Prop. M/s Mittal Traders, Adampur, Hisar from the assessee company. It was further informed that as per enquiries conducted and also through Inspector, Shri Kaushal Kumar Jain, Prop. Mittal Traders could not be found on the given address. The Id. AO made disallowance amounting to Rs 32,42,726/- being 20% of Rs 1,62,13,633/-, purchases made by the assessee company from M/s Ramesh Kumar Tarun Kumar and M/s Mittal Traders, solely based on the informati....