2025 (5) TMI 1289
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2025 passed by the Commissioner [Impugned order] which is assailed before us in this appeal. The operative part of the impugned order is as follows: ORDER In exercise of the powers conferred under Regulation 16(2) of the CBLR, 2018, I confirm the suspension of the Customs Broker Licence No. R-27/DEL/CUS/2018 (PAN No. AAZCS4574R), valid up to 17.8.2028 of M/s. Silverline Global Freight Pvt. Ltd., suspended vide OIO No. 03/VPS/Suspension/Policy/2025 dated 9.1.2025. M/s. Global Freight Pvt. Ltd. is directed to surrender their original Customs Broker License alogn with all the F/G/H cards issued to them immediately. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted as follows: a) The suspension has affected the livelihood of the appellant an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and perused the records. We do not wish to go into the merits of the allegations against the appellant at this stage because the report of the inquiry officer and the order of the Commissioner on the proposal to revoke the licence have yet to be issued. At this stage, we are only considering the limited question as to whether the confirmation of the suspension is justified based on the facts of this case. 5. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that no reason for immediate suspension of the appellant's licence was given is not correct. In fact, paragraph 5 of the Suspension Order dated 9.1.2025 clearly gives out the reasons and it is reproduced below: "5. Therefore, in view of the foregoing reasons, it appears that M/....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e non-existent. 9. The Commissioner, therefore, felt that: a) The appellant had not verified the description of the goods; b) the appellant had not verified the value of the goods; c) The appellant had not verified the existence of the exporter; and d) The appellant had not verified the credentials of the appellant because the GST Registration of the exporter was cancelled suo moto with effect from 7.2.2023. 10. For the above reasons, the Commissioner confirmed the suspension of the Customs Broker licence of the appellant. We note that the SCN proposing revocation of licence has been issued and an inquiry officer has also been appointed. We therefore, confine ourselves to the question as to whether the continuation of suspension o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bility to verify the FOB value of the goods (which is the transaction value decided between the buyer and seller) or check the market value of the goods (i.e., the value at which such goods are sold in Indian market). Therefore, suspension of the appellant's Custom Broker licence on this ground is also not correct. 13. The third reason for confirmation of suspension is that the appellant had not verified the existence of the exporter. Learned counsel for the appellant placed on record KYC documents such as Aadhar, PAN issued by the income tax authorities, IEC issued by the DGFT, a certificate from HDFC bank where the exporter had its bank account and Registration certificate issued by the GST officers. The case of the department is that Cu....