Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (11) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been directed to take notice. Accordingly, he is represented through a counsel. As the Appeal involves a short point, it is admitted and heard for final disposal. 2. This Appeal is preferred against the order dated 10th September, 1993, passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 6373 of 1993. In the Writ Petition, the respondent herein sought for quashing the order dated 5-3-1993, passed by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have gone through the provisional balance sheet of the petitioner company. As reflected in the provisional balance sheet, we note that more than Rs. 1.59 crores is due to the petitioner from sundry debtors and this is in addition to more than Rs. 15 lakhs shown under the asset column of the balance sheet as advance and deposits. We also take into account the admitted fact that the petitioner unit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh imposed on petitioner Coronation Litho Works (C.L.W.) and a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh imposed on petitioner Shri Nataraj Prabhu. During the course of the order the Tribunal has noticed that a sum of Rs. 25 lakhs is set apart towards depreciation and a sum of Rs. 1.59 crores is due to the respondent from sundry debtors. It is on the basis of these facts, the Tribunal appears to ....