Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2025 (5) TMI 966

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Learned Assessing Officer erred in passing order under section 154 by rejecting the contention of the appellant that debatable issue cannot be considered as prima facie additions. In view of this the order under section 154 is void-ab-inito and deserves to be struck down. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the CPC has erred in passing an intimation under section 143 (1) 6/07/2020 / under section 154 dated 27/10/2023 by enhancing the income by Rs. 1,82,09,000/-, by invoking provisions of section 50C of the IT Act, without appreciating the fact that provision of section 143(1)/154 does not envisage such additions, and therefore entire additions deserves to be deleted. 3. Without prejudice to the above ground....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e previous order passed u/s 154 on 27.11.2024 is hereby reversed. Further the assessee challenged the order u/s 154 of the Act but failed to get any relief from the Ld. CIT(A) who dismissed the appeal treating as infructuous. Now the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. Ld. counsel for the assessee stated that the assessee has already challenged the order u/s 143(1)(A) before Ld. CIT(A) and the same is still pending to be disposed off. He stated that the apparent mistake has been accepted once by Ld. AO and then it has been reversed. He also submitted that addition u/s 50C of the Act cannot be made in processing of return u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act. He also stated that the Ld. CIT(A) has not dealt with the merits of the case. 4. On th....