Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (6) TMI 85

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tated "that two out of the three questions arising in this petition stand concluded by decision of Division Bench of this Court reported in 1987 (32) E.L.T. 262 (Bom.) (Ashok Traders v. Union of India and Another). The only contention which survives for consideration is in respect of notification dated August 2,1976 issued by the Government of India under sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the Custom....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aw materials which is equivalent to duty paid on raw material in respect of synthetic fibre and yarn. Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act reads as follows :- "3(3). If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest to levy on any imported article [whether on such article duty is leviable under sub-section (1) or not] such additional duty as woul....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Section 3 cannot be cent-percent but can only be a portion of the duty leviable. We are unable to find any merit in the submission of the learned counsel. The ambit of sub-section (3) of Section 3 was examined by the Supreme Court in a decision reported in 1985 (20) E.L.T. 222 (S.C.) (Khandelwal Metal and Engineering Works and Another v. Union of India and Others). Chief Justice Chandrachud spea....