Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2025 (5) TMI 596

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and in law, the reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 are bad in law, inasmuch as the mandate of Section 147 of the Act was not satisfied. The appellant, therefore, prays that the assessment order u/s.147 read with Section 144B of the Act, dated 30.03.2022 be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in upholding the assessment order even though the same was passed in gross violation of basic principles of natural justice. The appellant, therefore, submits that the assessment order u/s.147 is bad in law, and therefore, prays that the said assessment order be set aside. 3. On ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come. The ld. AO issued notice u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act. As the assessee failed to furnish the complete details of form 16A/26AS of some of the deductee inspite of several opportunities, the ld. AO disallowed 30% of the total expenditure towards labour payment amounting to Rs. 46,24,322/- for which it was alleged that the assessee has failed to deduct TDS, thereby making an addition of the same to the business income of the assessee. The ld. AO passed the assessment order u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, dated 30.03.2022, determining total income at Rs. 31,99,167/-, after making an addition/disallowance of Rs. 13,87,297/-. 4. Aggrieved the assessee was in appeal before the first appellate authority, who vide order dated 14.06.2024....