TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (5) TMI 390
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or granting approval u/s 10(23C)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. 2. That the rejection of application u/s 10(23C)(iii) is against the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. That the replies as filed during the course of proceedings before the CIT(Exemptions) have not been considered properly. 4. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the grounds of appeal before the appeal is finally heard or deposed off." 3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the Indian Institute of Management Sirmaur is a Centrally Funded Institution of National Importance set up by the Government of India in 2015. IIM Sirmaur is one of the newer institutions of the IIM family in the country. As a premier institution, under aegis of Ministry of Education....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....me Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh for final registration under clause (iii) of first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act in Form 10AB dated 17.04.2024. 8. The CIT (Exemptions) called for detailed information, which was complied and no objection was raised to the activities carried out by the Trust. The CIT (Exemptions) refused to grant the registration, since it was noticed that the provisional approval could not have been granted to the assessee as the appellant has already commenced its activities in 2015 and, thus, it was stated by the CIT (Exemptions) that provisional approval being bad in law and, thus, rejected the application of the assessee. 9. It was argued by the Ld. Counsel that the assessee is engaged in providing a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mistake by the assessee for claiming the legitimate exemption/deduction, the Income Tax Authority is duty bound to consider such legitimate claim and give it under the proper and legitimate section to the assessee, even if it is claimed under wrong section. The Counsel also relied upon the following judgments: - a. The Habrol Cooperative Agricultural Service Society Limited vs. The ITO in ITA No. 158/Chd/2024 dated 26.09.2024 ITAT Chd. b. Punjab Agriculture University vs. The DCIT(Exemption), Chandigarh in ITA No. 661/Chd/2024 and 492/Chd/2024 dated 18.12.2024 ITAT Chd c. CIT vs Heidrick and Struggles Inc. reported in 461 ITR 33 (Delhi High Court) dated 25.07.2023 12. The assessee further, relied upon the judgment of Chandigarh Bench....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ection 10 is rejected. The appellant Institute is existing since 2015 and, as such, the approval was refused only on account of technical mistake on the part of the counsel of the assessee, who inadvertently had choosen wrong subsection while moving the application for approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10. 15. The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT in similar facts and circumstances, in the case of The Harbrol Cooperative Agricultural Service Society Ltd. in ITA No. 158/Chd/2024, where a similar issue was there has taken a view that if there is mistake by the assessee for claiming legitimate deduction, the AO is duty bound to consider such legitimate deduction to the assessee even if, it was not claimed or c....