Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 361

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short], for Assessment Year (AY) 2021-22. 2. The Assessee has taken following grounds of appeal:- "1. That on facts, in law, and on evidence on record, the learned NFAC has grievously erred in confirming the disallowance @ 2% (out of 3.92% made by AO) of the alleged bogus purchases of Rs. 12,61,68,630/- without any basis and on presumption only. 2. That on facts, in law, and on evidence on record, the learned NFAC ought to have deleted the entire addition in respect of alleged bogus purchases, as prayed for." 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee has been carrying on wholesale business in Jeera, Souff, Oil Seeds, Methi, Isabgul, Coriander, Suva, Magaj Tarabuj etc.. The assessee ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ow in appeal before the Tribunal. 8. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. We find that the reason for making the impugned addition was that, in response to the notice issued to the parties u/s 133(6) of the Act, no reply was submitted by any of the parties for confirmation of purchases made by the assessee. The Assessing Officer therefore disallowed 3.92% of total purchase considering it to be bogus purchase. The Ld. CIT(A) reduced the same to 2% of the alleged bogus purchases of Rs. 12,61,68,630/-, by observing as under:- "5.1 I have gone through the facts of the case, findings by the AO and the submissions made by the appellant. Grounds No. 1 of appeal are related to disallowance of purchase....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....turns and therefore their sales are reflected as my purchases in my GSTR-9 Table 8A. 2. Payment for purchases is made by RTGS through my Firm's two Bank Accounts with Kotak Mahindra Bank. 3. Goods have been moved from Gondal to my place or to the Buyers to whom I have sold these goods. 4. Goods purchased are duly recorded in my books and sales have also been made of these goods and whatever goods were not sold on 31- 03-2021 was shown in closing stock and sold in next year. 5. The purchase transactions with these two Parties are not dubious or doubtful transactions but they are genuine and real transactions. They are not Bogus Purchases to inflate the purchases but they are real purchases accounted in my books of account. 5.4 Thus....