2025 (5) TMI 379

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ingh, Advocates. For the Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocates for R-3. ORDER PER 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Amit Garg under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking direction to the Respondent No. 1 - Central Board of Indirect Tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a complaint under Section 175 (3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for registration of an FIR has also been filed in Lucknow. However, no action has been taken. 6. The Petitioner is an entity based out of Delhi with the GST registration in Delhi. Hence, this petition has been filed before this Court. 7. Ld. Senior Counsel has also relied upon a decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....number which has been used. 10. In this view of the matter, there is damage being caused to the Petitioner. Accordingly, it is directed that Respondent No. 2, which is the concerned Commissionerate based in Lucknow shall look into the matter on an urgent basis and take a decision within a period of 45 days. 11. The Petitioner may be heard before any order is passed. The hearing notice to the Pet....