Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (5) TMI 70

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rred to as 'the impugned order') passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals), Raigad, Navi Mumbai. 2.0 Briefly stated the facts of the case leading to this appeal are as follows: - 2.1 On the basis of third-party data received from the Income Tax Department reflecting therein the value of 'Sale of Services' as declared in Income Tax returns filed by the appellants during the period 2015-16 and the taxable value of services declared in the ST-3 returns filed with the Service Tax Department, an enquiry was conducted on the difference in the value of services shown in these two records. Based on such differences in the gross value provided, the Department came to the conclusion that the appellants have failed to discharge the ser....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orporation Ltd. during the period 01.06.2005 to 31.05.2016, out of the total demand of Rs.1,87,057/-, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the applicable rate of service tax during the relevant time was 14% i.e., from 01.06.2015 to 14.11.2015 and it was increased to 14.5% from 15.11.2015 to 31.05.2016 and hence, the correct amount of service tax payable was determined by him as Rs.1,82,290/-. The said amount of service tax had also been paid by the appellants along with interest of Rs.1,72,500/-. Therefore, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) by partly allowing appeal filed by the appellants had rejected the plea that penalty under Section 78(1) ibid has not been paid by the appellants. Feeling aggrieved with the said order of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rovided that in respect of the cases where the details relating to such transactions are recorded in the specified records for the period beginning with the 8th April, 2011 upto the date on which the Finance Bill, 2015 receives the assent of the President (both days inclusive), the penalty shall be fifty per cent. of the service tax so determined : Provided further that where service tax and interest is paid within a period of thirty days of - the date of service of notice under the proviso to (i) sub-section (1) of section 73, the penalty payable shall be fifteen per cent. of such service tax and proceedings in respect of such service tax, interest and penalty shall be deemed to be concluded; (ii) the da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r passed by the original authority and the learned Commissioner (Appeals), it reveals that on the basis of the details submitted by the appellants, the actual tax paid in respect of taxable services were confirmed by the Department and they were satisfied that the entire service tax liability has been properly paid by the appellants. Even in respect of the Service Tax demand on the taxable services provided to M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL), learned Chartered Accountant for the appellants had produced a work order issued by the IOCL dated 15.01.2015 for work contract of "Hydrojet cleaning and Dilution steam reboiler exchangers 11-E-1605 A/B/C/D/E/F/G tubes with 25000 PSI Machine of NCU at Panipat Naphtha Cracker", wherein it is spec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... from Income Tax Department. 2. In this regard, the undersigned is directed to inform that CBIC vide instructions dated 1-4-2021 and 23-4-2021 issued vide F.No. 137/472020-ST, has directed the field formations that while analysing ITR-TDS data received from Income Tax, a reconciliation statement has to be sought from the taxpayer for the difference and whether the service income earned by them for the corresponding period is attributable to any of the negative list services specified in Section 66D of the Finance Act, 1994 or exempt from payment of Service Tax, due to any reason. It was further reiterated that demand notices may not be issued indiscriminately based on the difference between the ITR-TDS taxable value and the taxable....