Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (4) TMI 1255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order in Original No. 19, dated 18-3-2011. The revenue has suggested the following questions of law for consideration. "(a)  Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Learned Tribunal is right and justified in holding that there were revenue neutrality and if it was, then are the statutory provisions of law to be ignored on that ground ? (b)     Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Learned Tribunal is right in allowing the appeal of the respondent/assessee and holding that interest is not payable by the assessee on the differential duty paid by them under the supplementary invoices raised?" We have elaborately Heard Learned Advocates on either sides. 2. On a perusal of the impugn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....be as such at the same value at which the goods were sold to independent buyers are assessed. Therefore, it was contended that no duty was payable by the assessee and the question of payment of interest on such additional duty does not arise. Further, the assessee contended that although they have paid duty upon the insistence of the department, if it is assumed that change in practice of valuation of stock transfer was adopted by the assessee on their own valuation, the assessee cannot be compelled to accept the situation which was legally incorrect. Further it was contended that department cannot compel the assessee to perpetuate the illegality and in such circumstances the whole exercise was revenue neutral. Therefore, the assessee is no....