2025 (4) TMI 1116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rge basis in respect of expenses incurred in foreign currency on business promotion and other activities. 2. The appellant is a manufacturer-exporter of pharmaceutical products and is a 100% Export Oriented Unit. It established representative offices in many countries to promote its goods and to liaison with the local authorities in such countries. According to the appellant, these representative offices do not have any independent revenue or clients and the purchase orders are entered with the clients directly by the appellant and so the representative offices do not enter into any contract with the clients. The payment for goods supplied to the customers is received by the appellant and all the expenses incurred in the supply of goods ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the earlier period. Reference was invited to the decision of the Tribunal in the Final Order No. 50314-50315/2018 dated 12.01.2018. For the period 2006-2007 to June 2012 i.e. pre-negative era, wherein the issue was decided by the Tribunal in favour of the appellant, relying on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs. Commissioner - 2015 (39) STR 97 (Tri.-Ahmd.) and Milind Kulkarni Vs. Commissioner - 2016 (44) STR 71 (Tri.-Mum.). It was accordingly, concluded that the tax liability under BAS cannot be sustained as the actual expenses now sought to be taxed are only with reference to setting up, running and also expenses of that branch incurred by the appellant and not relating to any expenditure in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... impugned order has erred in not reading Section 65(105) along with Section 66A and Rules framed for the purpose of charging tax on services received from abroad. Unless both are applied together, the jurisdiction to tax would be in question. ................................................... ................................................... 23. The catena of judgments cited for both sides, viz., British Airways v. Commissioner of Central Excise (Adjn) [2014-TIOL-979-CESTAT-Del = 2014 (36) S.T.R. 598 (Tri.-Del.)], Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax [2015 (39) S.T.R. 97 (Tri.-Ahmd.)] and Infosys Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax [2014-TIOL-409-CESTAT-Bang = 2015 (37) S.T.R. 862 (Tri.-Bang.)] do....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the purpose of refunding it subsequently does not pass the test of reason. More so, as there is no inference of any monitorial aspect in undertaking such an exercise. An exporter who operates through branches is clearly not the target of the legal fiction of branches being distinct from head office. The proposition that the intent of Section 66A in taxing the activity rendered by an overseas branch to its headquarters in India is limited to the local commercial or business activities of the head office is thereby confirmed. Consequently, mere existence as a branch for the overall promotion of the objectives of the primary establishment in India which is essentially an exporter of services does not render the transfer of financial resourc....