Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (4) TMI 1127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Since the facts and issued involved in both the appeals are identical and both the appeals are arising out of the same order of the ld. CIT(A), therefore, these have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. ITA No.378/Kol/2024 - The only issue raised by the assessee is against the part-confirmation of addition by the ld. CIT(A) at Rs. 9,33,440/- being 2% of the expenditure incurred in cash purely on estimated basis. 3. The facts in brief are that the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income on 13.02.2018 which was selected for limited scrutiny on the ground of huge cash withdrawals. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer issued notices including questionnaire ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urther submitted that his turnover for the FY 2016-17 only included the commission income and did not include the sales effected on behalf of the principals which is in compliance with the CBDT Circular: No.452 [F.No.201/3/85- IT (A-II)), dated 17-3-1986). [Copy of the CBDT Circular No 452 was enclosed vide Annexure-2: No. Of Pages-02). The assessee had received the money from the purchaser of jute Le. "Jute Mill Agents or Pucca Arahtiya' through the banking channel for arranging for the delivery of the jute to them as the commission agent. It was submitted that the amount received by the Appellant from the purchaser of the jute during the FY 2016-17 was through the banking Channel and the same was duly reflected in the Bank Stateme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that the several payments made by the Appellant to the various producer of the jute during the FY 2016-17 relevant to the AY 2017-18, does not exceeds the limits as prescribed u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 i.e. payment made to the single party on the single day exceeds the limit of Rs. 10,000/-, being the payment made otherwise than by an account payee cheque or an account payee bank draft or through the use of Electronic clearing system. The above shows that the assessee was able to explain the source of amount withdrawn but failed to substantiate the expenditure incurred (payment made to Fadiyaars or producers of jute). Considering the facts of the case and nature of business i.e. Kachcha Arahtiya; it would be just to disal....