Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Regulatory Body Must Establish Prima Facie Evidence of Anti-Competitive Practices Before Initiating Formal Investigation Under Section 26(1)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC determined CCI's jurisdiction to initiate investigation under Section 26(1) of Competition Act, 2002 requires establishing a prima facie case of anti-competitive practices under Sections 3 and/or 4. The court held that CCI must form a preliminary opinion based on received information indicating potential violation before directing investigation. Mere receipt of information does not automatically warrant investigation. The court emphasized that directing investigation without prima facie evidence is jurisdictionally invalid. Applying the test of examining information at face value, the court found no prima facie case existed in the present matter. Consequently, the court quashed CCI's investigation order as null and void, thereby allowing the petition and reaffirming procedural safeguards in competition law enforcement.....