2025 (3) TMI 1318

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ltd. (Komatsu) on 01.02.1998 and appellant was appointed as an agent/distributor for Komatsu for marketing, selling and promoting the sale of products in the territories as defined in the agreement. Alleging that the activity/service carried out by the appellant is falling under the category of 'Repair and Maintenance Service', proceedings were initiated for recovery of Rs.59,43,842/- against the consideration received in the month of March 2005. Show-cause notice was issued on 22.04.2010 and adjudication authority as per the impugned order confirmed the demand of duty. Aggrieved by the said order, present appeal is filed. 2. When the appeal came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the issue is no more res ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he findings of the Tribunal in appellant's own case reported in 2016 (46) STR 422 (Tri.-Mum.) where the Tribunal after referring the very same agreement held as follows: "6. From the various clauses of the agreement, it is seen that the appellant has been appointed as marketing agent to promote the sale of the products manufactured by L & T Komatsu Ltd. There is no indication, whatsoever in the agreement that the appellant has undertaken clearing and forwarding functions. Reliance placed by the Revenue on the Prabhat Zarda Factory (India) Ltd. case also shows that the activity undertaken by the appellant marketing/sales promotion agent. The said decision has been overruled by the Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the appellant's own....