TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (3) TMI 1140
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hul Shah, Partner, M/s Rosecut Diamonds and Sh. Ashwin Shah, Partner, M/s Rosecut Diamonds ("Appellants") respectively. The Appellants have challenged the Order dated 20.08.2010 ("Impugned Order") issued by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority, Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, New Delhi. The Ld. Adjudicating Authority vide Impugned Order imposed penalty of Rs 50,00,000/- (Rs Fifty Lakhs Only) for the contravention of Section 7 and 8 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 ("FEMA") read with Regulations 8, 9 and 13 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods & Services) Regulations, 2000 ("FEMA Regulations, 2000") on each of the two Appellants. The said contraventions on the two Appellants were read with Section 42(1) of FEM....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....m. Ld. Counsel pleaded that the other partner, one Sh. Ketan A Shah of M/s Rosecut Diamonds had taken all reasonable steps to realise and repatriate the export proceeds relating to the pending Export Bills. Sh. Ketan A Shah had taken all the steps to recover the proceeds pending against the Export Bills from the foreign buyers through letters, faxes, contacting the buyers through telephones etc. Sh. Ketan Shah had taken the steps to initiate legal proceedings in Hong Kong to recover the outstanding amount, however, the said proceedings could not be pursued due to prohibitive legal costs. Ld. Counsel for the Appellants pleaded to allow the two appeals and set aside the Impugned Order dated 20.08.2010. 3. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent argue....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....xport proceeds in respect of these GRs. In view of the statutory provisions of the Act, Ld. Adjudicating Authority has inferred that the provisions require the Exporter and not the Authorized Dealer to take the steps to realize and repatriate the proceeds of the Exports. Ld. Adjudicating Authority has examined the steps taken for the realization of the Export proceeds. In the absence of certain documents to corroborate the contention that the matter was pursued in Hong Kong Court which could not be furnished by the Exporter Noticee M/s Rosecut Diamonds and by its Directors, the Ld. Adjudicating Authority has held that these steps were not adequate. It is also on record that these initial steps could not be persisted due to financial hardshi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Rs for amount of USD 3,93,094.63, the statutory period of six months for realization and repatriation of the full export value of the goods exported had expired between 02.05.2000 to 13.08.2000, that is much before the date of resignation of the two Appellants w.e.f. 01.09.2000. 8. The pleadings made with respect to the efforts of contacting the buyers through letters, faxes and telephones etc. to be regarded as reasonable steps cannot be accepted as observed in the preceding paragraphs of this Order. We observe that Appellants too have failed to produce material available to corroborate that they had taken effective steps to recover /repatriate the foreign exchange dues. 9. We therefore, find that the resignation of the two Appellants fr....