2025 (3) TMI 1126
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as a plant within the meaning of the expression "plant or machinery" used in Section 175 (5) (d) is a factual question which has to be determined keeping in mind the business of the registered person and the role that building plays in the said business. If the construction of a building was essential for carrying out the activity of supplying services, such as renting or giving on lease or other transactions in respect of the building or a part thereof, which are covered by clauses (2) and (5) of Schedule II of the CGST Act, the building could be held to be a plant. Then, it is taken out of the exception carved out by clause (d) of Section 17 (5) of sub-section (1) of Section 16. Functionality test will have to be applied to decide whether a building is a plant. Therefore, by using the functionality test, in each case, on facts, in the light of what we have held earlier, it will have to be decided whether the construction of an immovable property is a "plant" for the purposes of clause (d) of Section 17 (5)" c. Issue such other Writ or direction as this Hon'ble Court deem fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the present case." 2. Heard learned counsel for the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....provisions. It is for the legislature to step in and remove the absurdity; c. While dealing with a taxing provision, the principle of strict interpretation should be applied; d. If two interpretations of a statutory provision are possible, the Court ordinarily would interpret the provision in favour of a taxpayer and against the revenue; e. In interpreting a taxing statute, equitable considerations are entirely out of place; f. A taxing provision cannot be interpreted on any presumption or assumption; g. A taxing statute has to be interpreted in the light of what is clearly expressed. The Court cannot imply anything which is not expressed. Moreover, the Court cannot import provisions in the statute to supply any deficiency; h. There is nothing unjust in the taxpayer escaping if the letter of the law fails to catch him on account of the legislature's failure to express itself clearly; i. If literal interpretation is manifestly unjust, which produces a result not intended by the legislature, only in such a case can the Court modify the language; j. Equity and taxation are strangers. But if construction result....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gistered persons who shall, in respect of supply of specified categories of goods or services or both received from an unregistered supplier, pay the tax on reverse charge basis as the recipient of such supply of goods or services or both, and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such recipient as if he is the person liable for paying the tax in relation to such supply of goods or services or both. (5) The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify categories of services the tax on intra-State supplies of which shall be paid by the electronic commerce operator if such services are supplied through it, and all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such electronic commerce operator as if he is the supplier liable for paying the tax in relation to the supply of such services: Provided that where an electronic commerce operator does not have a physical presence in the taxable territory, any person representing such electronic commerce operator for any purpose in the taxable territory shall be liable to pay tax: Provided further that where an electronic commerce operator does not have a physical presence in the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to a recipient or any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise, before or during movement of goods, either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise; (ii) where the services are provided by the supplier to any person on the direction of and on account of such registered person. (ba) the details of input tax credit in respect of the said supply communicated to such registered person under Section 38 has not been restricted; (c) subject to the provisions of Section 41 [* * *], the tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the Government, either in cash or through utilisation of input tax credit admissible in respect of the said supply; and (d) he has furnished the return under Section 39: Provided that where the goods against an invoice are received in lots or instalments, the registered person shall be entitled to take credit upon receipt of the last lot or instalment: Provided further that where a recipient fails to pay to the supplier of goods or services or both, other than the supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppellate Authority or the Appellate Tribunal or court and where availment of input tax credit in respect of an invoice or debit note was not restricted under sub-section (4) on the date of order of cancellation of registration, the said person shall be entitled to take the input tax credit in respect of such invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or both, in a return under Section 39,- (i) filed up to thirtieth day of November following the financial year to which such invoice or debit note pertains or furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier; or (ii) for the period from the date of cancellation of registration or the effective date of cancellation of registration, as the case may be, till the date of order of revocation of cancellation of registration, where such return is filed within thirty days from the date of order of revocation of cancellation of registration, whichever is later." From sub-section (1) of Section 16, it is apparent that only a registered person, as defined by Section 2 (94) of the CGST Act, can avail of ITC. A person who is registered under Section 25 of the CGST Act becomes a registered....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e of furnishing of the return under section 39 for the month of September, 2018 till the due date of furnishing of the return under the said section for the month of March, 2019 in respect of any invoice or invoice relating to such debit note for supply of goods or services or both made during the financial year 2017-18, the details of which have been uploaded by the supplier under sub-section (1) of section 37 till the due date for furnishing the details under sub-section (1) of said section for the month of March, 2019." The Finance Act, 2022, substituted the words "due date of furnishing return under Section 39 for the month of September" with "thirtieth day of November" with effect from 1st October 2022. Under Section 39 (1), every registered person other than an Input Service Distributor is required to furnish for every calendar month or part thereof a return of inward and outward supplies of goods or services or both, ITC availed, tax payable, tax paid, etc. The meaning of sub-section (4) of Section 16 as amended is that a registered person can avail of ITC in respect of any invoice or debit note for the supply of goods or services before 30th day of November followi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d health insurance: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available where an inward supply of such goods or services or both is used by a registered person for making an outward taxable supply of the same category of goods or services or both or as an element of a taxable composite or mixed supply; (ii) membership of a club, health and fitness centre; and (iii) travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as leave or home travel concession: Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such goods or services or both shall be available, where itis obligatory for an employer to provide the same to its employees under any law for the time being in force. (c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service; (d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property(other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d conditions for taking ITC. Sub-section (1) of Section 18 deals with the availability of ITC in special circumstances. Therefore, in the cases covered by sub-section (5), ITC is not available. In a sense, sub-section (5) of Section 17 carves out an exception to the provisions of sub-section (1) of Sections 16 and 18, which confer the benefit of ITC. ANALYSIS OF CLAUSES (c) AND (d) 31. Now, we analyse clauses (c) and (d) of Section 17 (5). Clause (c) applies when works contract services are supplied for constructing immovable property. The definition of "works contract" under Section 2 (119) is extensive. It reads thus: "2. Definitions:- .................... (119) "works contract" means a contract for building, construction, fabrication, completion, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair, maintenance, renovation, alteration or commissioning of any immovable property wherein transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) is involved in the execution of such contract;" Thus, in the case of works contract services supplied for the construction of immovable property, the benefi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., which reads thus: "Explanation.-For the purposes of this Chapter and Chapter VI, the expression - plant and machinery means apparatus, equipment, and machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support that are used for making outward supply of goods or services or both and includes such foundation and structural supports but excludes- (i) land, building or any other civil structures; (ii) telecommunication towers; and (iii) pipelines laid outside the factory premises." The explanation defines the meaning of the expression "plant and machinery". However, as stated earlier, the expression "plant or machinery" has not been defined under the CGST Act. It is pertinent to note that clauses(c) and (d) do not altogether exclude every class of immovable property from the applicability of ITC. In the case of clause (c), if the construction is of "plant and machinery" as defined, the benefit of ITC will accrue. Similarly, under clause (d), if the construction is of a "plant or machinery", ITC will be available. 36. The Union legislature cannot levy taxes on lands and buildings as it is exclusively a State subject at itemno.49 i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....es, as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council, shall be treated neither as a supply of goods nor a supply of services. (3) Subject to the provisions of Sub-sections (1), (1-A) and (2), the Government may, on there commendations of the Council, specify, by notification, the transactions that are to be treated as- (a) a supply of goods and not as a supply of services; or (b) a supply of services and not as a supply of goods." 37. In view of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 7, a supply of services such as sale, transfer, licence, rental or lease made for consideration is a supply. Whether the activities or transactions covered by sub-section (1) of Section 7 constitute a supply has to be considered in light of Schedule II. Schedule II has a title: "Activities or transactions to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services". The activities/transactions incorporated in Schedule II are treated as a supply of service. As far as lands and buildings are concerned, clauses (2) and (5) of Schedule II are relevant, which read thus: "2. Land and Building (a) any lease, tenancy, easement, licenc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....thus: "5. Sale of land and, subject to clause (b) of paragraph 5 of Schedule II, sale of building." 39. Analysis of the provisions of Section 7 read with Schedule II and III shows that: a. Any lease, tenancy, easement or licence to occupy land is a supply of services. Clause 2(a) is not qualified by the purpose of the use. But the sale of a land is not a supply of service; b. Any lease or letting out of buildings for business or commerce, wholly or partly, is a supply of services. Clause 2(b) will not apply if the lease or letting out of a building is for a residential purpose; c. Renting of an immovable property is a supply of service; d. Construction of a complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof, including a complex, building or civil structure intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly, is a supply of service. However, the construction of a complex, building or civil structure, referred to above, is excluded from the category of supply of service if the entire consideration for sale is received after issuance of the completion certificate, wherever required or its first occupation, whichever is earlier. Broadl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... The question is whether the explanation that lays down the meaning of the expression "plant and machinery" in Section 17 will apply to the expression "plant or machinery" used in Section 17 (5) (d). 43. Learned ASG himself accepted that the expression "plant and machinery" appears at ten different places in Chapters V (Input Tax Credit) and VI (Tax Invoice, Credit and Debit Notes) of the CGST Act. According to him, the expression "plant or machinery" appears only in clause (d) of Section 17 (5). His submission is that the use of the word "or" in clause (d) is a mistake of the legislature. To counter this, it was submitted that in the Model GST Law, which the GST Council Secretariat circulated in November 2016 to invite suggestions and comments from the public, the expression 'plant and machinery' was used in clauses (c) and (d). However, while enacting the CGST Act, the legislature has consciously chosen to use the expression "plant or machinery" only in clause (d). The impugned judgment in the main Civil Appeal is more than five years old. The writ petition in which the impugned decision was rendered is a six-year-old writ petition. If it was a drafting mistake, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt of machinery or vice versa. This expression cannot be read as "plant or machinery". That is so clear from the explanation in Section 17, which says that plant and machinery means apparatus, equipment and machinery fixed to the earth by foundation or structural support that are used for making outward supply of goods or services or both. The expression includes such foundation and structural support fixed to the earth. However, the definition excludes land, buildings or any other civil structure. 46. The expression "plant or machinery" has a different connotation. It can be either a plant or machinery. Section 17 (5)(d) deals with the construction of an immovable property. The very fact that the expression" immovable property other than "plants or machinery" is used shows that there could be a plant that is an immovable property. As the word 'plant' has not been defined under the CGST Act or the rules framed there under, its ordinary meaning in commercial terms will have to be attached to it. 47. There are few decisions relied upon on this aspect. The first is CCE v. Solid & Correct Engineering Works [2010] (252) ELT 481 (SC)/[2010] 5 SCC 122. The case a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the purposes of business, profession or vocation. The Court considered whether the word plant should be given a broader meaning. In paragraph 6 of the said decision, this Court held thus: "6. Now it is well settled that where the definition of a word has not been given, it must be construed in its popular sense if it is a word of everyday use. Popular sense means "that sense which people conversant with the subject-matter with which the statute is dealing, would attribute to it". In the present case, Section 10(5) enlarges the definition of the word "plant" by including in it the words which have already been mentioned before. The very fact that even books have been included shows that the meaning intended to be given to "plant" is wide. The word "includes" is often used in interpretation clauses in order to enlarge the meaning of the words or phrases occurring in the body of the statute. When it is soused, those words and phrases must be construed as comprehending not only such things as they signify according to their nature and import but also those things which the interpretation clause declares that they shall include. The word "include" is also susceptible of other....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....th Section 32, which provided for granting depreciation to buildings, machinery, and plants. This Court extensively referred to its earlier decision in the case of Taj Mahal Hotel (supra) and other decisions of this Court and High Courts. This Court decided the question of whether a building used for running a hotel or cinema business could be held to be a plant. This Court considered British decisions on the point. Paragraphs 61 to 63 of the decision are material, which read thus: "61. Further, there are hotels of all kinds and hotel business can be carried on in all kinds of buildings, may be pucca or kuccha constructions. A building intended to be used or in fact used earlier either as a residential accommodation or business purpose can be converted for running hotel business. Section 32 itself contemplates a hotel business being carried on in a residential accommodation including an accommodation which is in the nature of guest house. On occasions hotel buildings may be constructed with a special design and features so as to attract and accommodate a certain class of tourist. Similarly with regard to cinema business, it can be carried on in a specially-designe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ces and, therefore, applying the functional tests the assessee would be entitled to depreciation under the head "it is more beneficial to it". He submitted that in the modern era, theatre building and hotel building are integral part of operation for carrying out such business and, therefore, such building should be considered as a "plant". Ultimately, in paragraph 67, this Court held thus: "67. In the result, it is held that the building used for running of a hotel or carrying on cinema business cannot be held to be a plant because: (1) The scheme of Section 32, as discussed above, clearly envisages separate depreciation for a building, machinery and plant, furniture and fittings etc. The word "plant" is given inclusive meaning under Section 43 (3) which nowhere includes buildings. The Rules prescribing the rates of depreciation specifically provide grant of depreciation on buildings, furniture and fittings, machinery and plant and ships. Machinery and plant include cinematograph films and other items and the building is further given meaning to include roads, bridges, culverts, wells and tube wells. (2) In the case of Taj Mahal Hotel [(1971) 3 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f the Income Tax Act. (7) To differentiate a building for grant of additional depreciation by holding it to be a "plant" in one case where the building is specially designed and constructed with some special features to attract the customers and a building not so constructed but used for the same purpose, namely, as a hotel or theatre would be unreasonable." 50. Another decision on the point is in the case of Victory Aqua Farm Ltd. (supra), wherein the issue before this Court was whether a natural pond used by the assessee, which was specially designed for rearing prawns, could be a plant within the meaning of Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This Court heavily relied upon the decision of a three-judge Bench of this Court in the case of Karnataka Power Corpn. (supra). In this case, the question was whether a power-generating station building is a plant. In the decision rendered by a Bench of three Hon'ble Judges, it was held that the decision in the case of Anand Theatres (supra) cannot be read broadly. In paragraphs 5 to 8 of the decision, it was held thus: "5. It was the case of the assessee that it was entitled to investment allowance as app....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n building was not to be treated as a plant for the purposes of investment allowance. 8. It is difficult to read the judgment in the case of Anand Theatres [(2000) 5 SCC 393 : [2000] 110Taxman 338/244 ITR 192 (SC) so broadly. The question before the Court was whether a building that was used as a hotel or a cinema theatre could be given depreciation on the basis that it was a "plant" and it was in relation to that question that the Court considered a host of authorities of this country and England and came to the conclusion that a building which was used as a hotel or a cinema theatre could not be given depreciation on the basis that it was a plant. We must add that the Court said: (SCC p. 430,para 67) "67. (7) To differentiate a building for grant of additional depreciation by holding it to be a 'plant' in one case where the building is specially designed and constructed with some special features to attract the customers and a building not so constructed but used for the same purpose, namely, as a hotel or theatre would be unreasonable." This observation is, in our view, limited to buildings that are used for the purposes of hotels or cinema the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rtificate is granted. Therefore, if a building qualifies to be a plant, ITC can be availed against the supply of services in the form of renting or leasing the building or premises, provided the other terms and conditions of the CGST Act and Rules framed thereunder are fulfilled. Therefore, the argument regarding breaking the chain cannot be accepted in its entirety. However, if the construction of a building by the recipient of service is for his own use, the chain will break, and therefore, ITC would not be available. 54. One of the arguments of learned ASG was that if different meanings were given to the words "plant and machinery" and "plant or machinery", it could result in discriminatory treatment. Clause (c) of Section 17 (5) operates in a completely different field, as it applies only to works contract services supplied for the construction of immovable property. Clause (d) deals with services received by a taxable person for the construction of an immovable property on his own account. As clauses (c) and (d) operate in substantially different areas, the argument of ASG relying on discrimination cannot be accepted. 55. Under the CGST Act, as observed earli....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion and the CGST Act, goods and services and input goods and input services are not treated as one and the same and they are distinct species. 105. Parliament engrafted a provision for refund Section 54 (3). In enacting such a provision, Parliament is entitled to make policy choices and adopt appropriate classifications, given the latitude which our constitutional jurisprudence allows it in matters involving tax legislation and to provide for exemptions, concessions and benefits on terms, as it considers appropriate. The consistent line of precedent of this Court emphasises certain basic precepts which govern both judicial review and judicial interpretation of tax legislation. These precepts are: 105.1. Selecting the objects to be taxed, determining the quantum of tax, legislating for the conditions for the levy and the socio-economic goals which a tax must achieve are matters of legislative policy. M. Hidayatullah, C.J., speaking for the Constitution Bench in Commr. of Urban Land Tax v. Buckingham & Carnatic Co. Ltd. [Commr. of Urban Land Tax v. Buckingham & Carnatic Co. Ltd., (1969) 2 SCC 55] held : (SCC p. 67, Para 10) "10. ... The objects to be taxed....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved by the law. The State, in the exercise of its governmental power, has, of necessity, to make laws operating differently in relation to different groups or classes of persons to attain certain ends and must, therefore, possess the power to distinguish and classify persons or things. It is also recognised that no precise or set formulae or doctrinaire tests or precise scientific principles of exclusion or inclusion are to be applied. The test could only be one of palpable arbitrariness applied in the context of the felt needs of the times and societal exigencies informed by experience." 105.3. In matters of classification, involving fiscal legislation, the legislature is permitted a larger discretion so long as there is no transgression of the fundamental principle underlying the doctrine of classification. In Hiralal Rattanlal [Hiralal Rattanlal v. State of U.P., (1973) 1 SCC 216 : 1973 SCC (Tax)307], K.S. Hegde, J., speaking for a four-Judge Bench observed : (SCC p. 223, Para 20) "20. It must be noticed that generally speaking the primary purpose of the levy of all taxes is to raise funds for public good. Which....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ture in the matter of classification of objects, persons and things for purposes of taxation. It must need to be so, having regard to the complexities involved in the formulation of a taxation policy. Taxation is not now a mere source of raising money to defray expenses of Government. It is a recognised fiscal tool to achieve fiscal and social objectives. The differentia of classification presupposes and proceeds on the premise that it distinguishes and keeps apart as a distinct class hotels with higher economic status reflected in one of the indicia of such economic superiority. The presumption of constitutionality has not been dislodged by the petitioners by demonstrating how even hotels, not brought into the class, have also equal or higher chargeable receipts and how the assumption of economic superiority of hotels to which the Act is applied is erroneous or irrelevant." 108. In Spences Hotel (P) Ltd. v. State of W.B. [Spences Hotel (P) Ltd. v. State of W.B., (1991) 2 SCC 154], a two-Judge Bench, speaking through K.N. Saikia, J. revisited the precedents of this Court governing the principles of classification in tax legislation and held : (SCC pp. 168-69, para 24) ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0. Parliament while enacting the provisions of Section 54 (3), legislated within the fold of the GST regime to prescribe a refund. While doing so, it has confined the grant of refund in terms of the first proviso to Section 54 (3) to the two categories which are governed by clauses (i) and (ii). A claim to refund is governed by statute. There is no constitutional entitlement to seek a refund. Parliament has in clause (i) of the first proviso allowed a refund of the unutilised ITC in the case of zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax. Under clause (ii) of the first proviso, Parliament has envisaged a refund of unutilised ITC, where the credit has accumulated on account of the rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies. When there is neither a constitutional guarantee nor a statutory entitlement to refund, the submission that goods and services must necessarily be treated on a par on a matter of a refund of unutilised ITC cannot be accepted. Such an interpretation, if carried to its logical conclusion would involve unforeseen consequences, circumscribing the legislative discretion of Parliament to fashion the rate of tax, concessions and exemp....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ception to the application of this principle of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India. However, it is well settled that the legislature enjoys very wide latitude in the matter of classification of objects, persons and things for the purpose of taxation in view of inherent complexity of fiscal adjustment of diverse elements. The power of the legislature to classify is of wide range and flexibility so that it can adjust its system of taxation in all proper and reasonable ways. Even so, large latitude is allowed to the State for classification upon a reasonable basis and what is reasonable is a question of practical details and a variety of factors which the court will be reluctant and perhaps ill-equipped to investigate." Apart from these decisions, there are other binding decisions which hold that the laws relating to economic activities should be viewed with greater latitude than laws touching civil rights such as freedom of speech, religion, etc. In the present case, the legislature was dealing with a complex issue. Therefore, greater freedom and greater play in the joints has to be allowed to the legislature. 58. Essentially, the challeng....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by the assessees how such a violation is made out. 62. While dealing with a taxing statute, it can always be said that, ideally, a particular provision ought not to have been incorporated or ought to have been incorporated with a modification. Even if this can be said, per se, the particular provision does not become unconstitutional. The Court cannot impose its views on the legislature. 63. Now, we come to the challenge to sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST Act, which reads thus: "16. Eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit.- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) A registered person shall not be entitled to take input tax credit in respect of any invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or both after the thirtieth day of November following the end of financial year to which such invoice or debit note pertains or furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier: Provided that the registered person shall be entitled to take input tax credit after the due date of furnishing of the return under Section 39 for the month of September, 2018 till the due date ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se or other transactions in respect of the building or a part thereof, which are covered by clauses (2) and (5) of Schedule II of the CGST Act, the building could be held to be a plant. Then, it is taken out of the exception carved out by clause (d) of Section 17 (5) to sub-section (1) of Section 16. Functionality test will have to be applied to decide whether a building is a plant. Therefore, by using the functionality test, in each case, on facts, in the light of what we have held earlier, it will have to be decided whether the construction of an immovable property is a "plant" for the purposes of clause (d) of Section 17 (5). 66. In the light of what we have held above, by setting aside the impugned judgment in Civil Appeal Nos.2948 and 2949 of 2023, the writ petitions are remanded to the High Court of Orissa for limited purposes of deciding whether, in the facts of the case, the shopping mall is a "plant" in terms of clause (d) of Section17 (5). Appeals are partly allowed in above terms. 67. While deciding these cases, we cannot make any final adjudication on the question of whether the construction of immovable property carried out by the petitioners in Writ ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI