Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Directors Not Liable Under Section 141 NI Act For Dishonored Cheques Due To Lack Of Direct Business Involvement

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC ruled in favor of company directors, quashing criminal proceedings under NI Act for dishonored cheques. Court determined petitioners successfully demonstrated they were not responsible for company's business conduct when offense occurred. Following precedent from Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan case, HC found unimpeachable evidence at pre-trial stage showing directors lacked involvement in cheque transactions. Complaint failed to establish specific roles of directors or their control over business operations. Mere directorship was insufficient to trigger vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act. Court emphasized requirement for clear evidence of direct responsibility in company management for criminal liability to attach. Petition allowed, proceedings against directors terminated.....